How do I get my Accuracy up?

Accuracy as a mage depends on Luk. Int is more on the damage side of things.

That CANNOT be correct, or Lukless would be completely ineffective. My lvl 160 lukless Bishop has 6 luk, but I've literally never missed a Newt, Skel, Zakum or Horntail. I started going to Newts at lvl 120, the instant I got Genesis. My girlfriend is a lvl 152 F/P Lukless Archmage, she likewise does not miss on Newts, Skels, Zakum or Horntail.

I think people have tested and found that LUKless mages have a harder time hitting things. This is because LUK = .5 Accuracy. INT has less weight on the mages' ability to hit things, but it still does the job.

I think people have tested and found that LUKless mages have a harder time hitting things. This is because LUK = .5 Accuracy. INT has less weight on the mages' ability to hit things, but it still does the job.

I checked the training references at SouthPerry, and went wraiths ---> hoodoes/voodoes ---> Himes ---> Newts. Because this happened during the Yollande 2x event, (made 4x by cards,) time was crucial and I couldn't afford to train inefficiently. My average lvl gain per day towards the end of the event was 5-6 lvls per day on 4x. All that said, I personally only had trouble hitting stuff when I tried going to Himes at a ridiculously low level. I don't remember the exact lvl I could hit them consistently, but I THINK it was at the early to mid 80s. Having max HS was pretty much prerequisite for getting party anyway. Once I was able to hit them consistently for even crap damage, I mobbed the whole map and brought it to my DK, who then killed all of them, which allowed efficient training. I honestly don't remember having accuracy issues in any other place as lukless cleric/priest/bishop, even though I had clean equips until lvl 131.

I checked the training references at SouthPerry, and went wraiths ---> hoodoes/voodoes ---> Himes ---> Newts. Because this happened during the Yollande 2x event, (made 4x by cards,) time was crucial and I couldn't afford to train inefficiently. My average lvl gain per day towards the end of the event was 5-6 lvls per day on 4x. All that said, I personally only had trouble hitting stuff when I tried going to Himes at a ridiculously low level. I don't remember the exact lvl I could hit them consistently, but I THINK it was at the early to mid 80s. Having max HS was pretty much prerequisite for getting party anyway. Once I was able to hit them consistently for even crap damage, I mobbed the whole map and brought it to my DK, who then killed all of them, which allowed efficient training. I honestly don't remember having accuracy issues in any other place as lukless cleric/priest/bishop, even though I had clean equips until lvl 131.

Then that would be how satisfactory INT is when it comes to hitting things. I was referring to tests conducted by lvl 1x-2x Magicians, and they were trying to hit various monsters, from Jr. Neckis to Green Mushrooms.

I think people have tested and found that LUKless mages have a harder time hitting things. This is because LUK = .5 Accuracy. INT has less weight on the mages' ability to hit things, but it still does the job.

http://sleepywood.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1312521

The difference is very minimal, though there has yet to be evident if INT and LUK are equal or not.

I think the more important thing to look at is the long term/bigger numbers/end behavior of equations. Though those level 1x-2x magician play a role, the overall equation takes more into account at later levels. So I don't think it would be accurate to make any conclusions in terms of saying "LUK/INT is more important when it comes to accuracy" for low levels. Though we can't even say anything for high levels.