v.98 - Cake vs. Pie 2: Winner Bake All Update Notes

Too bad they didn't fix the glaring flaw in the event. Payout on insignias being far too low to realisticly get even one of the top items. Unless theres a fight every 500 Pieces or something about as low.

Well if it's still the same as last year, you can get up to 10 per win and 5 per loss. It's gonna be rather close though, because last year, people were barely able to get enough insigs for both chairs, which led to around 900-1000 insignias. Going for the shoulderpad and chair is already 600 insignias.

i will be amazed if they don't bork something on the DrK's with this update

in the meantime, L> WS exploit that is obviously gonna happen.

So what did the shoulderpads offer again?

So what did the shoulderpads offer again?

Nothing special.
3/3/3/3 I think.

Nothing special.
3/3/3/3 I think.

2 attack too iirc but weren't they tme limited?

I'll believe the timer when I see the timer.

It only takes hackers 30min to kill HT, Nexon

2 attack too iirc but weren't they tme limited?

Combattente's extractions indicate they are time limited, however if their insignia cost was changed then (although unlikely) that status could be changed.

So what's the point of putting in a 1.25 hr timer if they're kicking everyone in the balls by not removing the 30 person limit?

You imply that the limit is intentional. Somehow they crossbred SEA's stupid anti hack system with tickets and hidden drop timer with our old system, and thats why it acts up like this. They have not the slightest clue about it.

You imply that the limit is intentional. Somehow they crossbred SEA's stupid anti hack system with tickets and hidden drop timer with our old system, and thats why it acts up like this. They have not the slightest clue about it.

I have trouble believing anything is unintentional when they have unlimited access to source code, but your point is still valid. It needs to be removed either way.

I have trouble believing anything is unintentional when they have unlimited access to source code, but your point is still valid. It needs to be removed either way.

I have unlimited access to the Encyclopedia Britannica on my shelf. Doesn't mean I know even 1% of what's written there.

They get code updates from other versions and apply automated tools to merge the new code into theirs (or completely overwrite the old version). They don't have to actually read the new code and see what it does and how.

Anyway, yeah, these fail "anti-hack" measures have got to go.


In an unrelated wtp, do they have like a ticket lottery to pick a bug to fix? That's the only reason I can think of for the Black Metus normal attack bug to have gotten priority to be fixed. And posted in the update notes too! Just exactly how many players has this major issue affected?

I have unlimited access to the Encyclopedia Britannica on my shelf. Doesn't mean I know even 1% of what's written there.

They get code updates from other versions and apply automated tools to merge the new code into theirs (or completely overwrite the old version). They don't have to actually read the new code and see what it does and how.

Anyway, yeah, these fail "anti-hack" measures have got to go.

"Oh look, HT is doing something for months that we never wrote code for it to do. Let's go back and see why it does that."

And that's after the fact. It's bad practice to even run into that scenario in the first place because they should be reviewing their newly integrated code regardless of it being included through automation or not.

"Oh look, HT is doing something for months that we never wrote code for it to do. Let's go back and see why it does that."

And that's after the fact. It's bad practice to even run into that scenario in the first place because they should be reviewing their newly integrated code regardless of it being included through automation or not.

You talk like you're new to Nexon's incompetence.

[SIZE="1"]I can confirm both Aura and Hex of the Beholder now works with Combat Orders. Just tested.[/SIZE]

You talk like you're new to Nexon's incompetence.

No, but if that includes developers, then yes i'm new to people coding being malpractice'd.