Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Physics..
#1
So.. Errr, yeah. -confused-

-Note- AP Physics problems. FUN TIMES AHEAD!

52) Two vectors A and B have precisely equal magnitudes. In order for the magnitude of A+B to be larger than the magnitude of A-B by the factor n, what must be the angle between them?

He had given us a few hints, but I can't seem the piece together how I'd actually use these hints in practice.

Hint 1: Law of Cosines
Hint 2: Trig Identities

So if anyone could explain this problem, that would be dandy.
Reply
#2
Edit: Oh never mind, I somehow overlooked the word "factor". Big difference there. D:
Reply
#3
Wouldn't 'by a factor of n' mean you multiply (A-B) by n to get (A+B)?
Reply
#4
HooKarez Wrote:Wouldn't 'by a factor of n' mean you multiply (A-B) by n to get (A+B)?

That is correct.

Code:
|[B]A[/B]-[B]B[/B]|*n = |[B]A[/B]+[B]B[/B]|
|[B]A[/B]| = |[B]B[/B]|
a*[B][I]i[/I][/B] + b*[B][I]j[/I][/B] = [B]A[/B]
x*[B][I]i[/I][/B] + y*[B][I]j[/I][/B] = [B]B[/B]

I'm thinking rhombi and triangles.

If n = 1, then theta = 90 degrees. That much I can tell you immediately.

 Workspace
Reply
#5
I don't really get there the (n^2 - 1) came from.

So, the answer, as told from someone in my class who refused to explain it to me, is:

θ = 2tan[SIZE="1"]-1[/SIZE](1/n)

e_e;
Reply
#6
Oops, I think I jumped too far ahead and was being a naughty boy >.< It should have actually been this:

Code:
|[B]A[/B]|^2*n^2 - |[B]A[/B]|^2 = (n^2 - 1) * |[B]A[/B]|^2

This might get a bit random until I finish...
(n^2 - 1) * (|[B]A[/B]|^2 + |[B]B[/B]|^2) - 2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]|cos(θ)*n^2 + 2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]|cos(180-θ) = 0
(n^2 - 1) * (|[B]A[/B]|^2 + |[B]B[/B]|^2) + 2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]|cos(180-θ) = 2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]|cos(θ)*n^2
(n^2 - 1) * (|[B]A[/B]|^2 + |[B]B[/B]|^2) + 2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]| * (cos(180-θ) - cos(θ)*n^2) = 0
(n^2 - 1) * (|[B]A[/B]|^2 + |[B]B[/B]|^2) / (2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]|) + cos(180-θ) - cos(θ)*n^2 = 0
(n^2 - 1) * (|[B]A[/B]|^2 + |[B]B[/B]|^2) / (2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]|) = cos(θ)*n^2 / cos(180-θ)
(1 - 1/n^2) * (|[B]A[/B]|^2 + |[B]B[/B]|^2) / (2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]|) = cos(θ)/cos(180-θ)

cos(180-θ) = cos(180)cos(θ) + sin(180)sin(θ) = -cos(θ)

(1 - 1/n^2) * (|[B]A[/B]|^2 + |[B]B[/B]|^2) / (2|[B]A[/B]||[B]B[/B]|) = -1

Crap... this isn't right...

One thing that I should have done from the very start was saying |A| = |B| so I wouldn't have to deal with the clutter of A's and B's.
Reply
#7
Uhhh I haven't taken physics AP but don't you just do law of cosines?

Assume |A| = |B| = 1 (problem doesn't state otherwise, so why not)

Then, by Law of Cosines:
|A+B| = sqrt(1 + 1 - 2 cos θWink = sqrt(2 - 2 cos θWink
|A-B| = sqrt(1 + 1 - 2 cos (180-θWink) = sqrt(2 + 2 cos θWink

|A+B| = n*|A-B|
sqrt(2 - 2 cos θWink = n*(sqrt(2 + 2 cos θWink)
2 - 2 cos θ = 2n^2 + 2n^2 cos θ
2 - 2n^2 = (2 + 2n^2) cos θ
cos θ = (1 - n^2)/(1 + n^2)

Probably able to be simplified, but I can't be bothered.
Reply
#8
Russt Wrote:Uhhh I haven't taken physics AP but don't you just do law of cosines?

Assume |A| = |B| = 1 (problem doesn't state otherwise, so why not)

That's a no-no. Only reason why it doesn't matter this time is because they completely cancel each other out.

 Alright, 2nd attempt, or so help me jebus!
Reply
#9
KajitiSouls Wrote:That's a no-no. Only reason why it doesn't matter this time is because they completely cancel each other out.

 Alright, 2nd attempt, or so help me jebus!
Well the way the problem is stated, it either doesn't matter, or the answer has to be in terms of |A| as well as n. Intuitively the magnitude of the vectors can change and the angles are still the same, so I just assumed they were unit vectors to make it cleaner. Probably not the most proper, but it gets the answer.

Hm, seems either you or I dropped a negative sign somewhere. I think it might've been me.

Edit: Oh, I see. I designated theta as the other angle.
Reply
#10
Russt Wrote:Edit: Oh, I see. I designated theta as the other angle.

Yup. The only way I can see it being simplified further is doing partial fractions for your approach, but even then that doesn't get it into the nice compact form of arctan.

I hate trig >_>
Reply
#11
KajitiSouls Wrote:That's a no-no. Only reason why it doesn't matter this time is because they completely cancel each other out.

 Alright, 2nd attempt, or so help me jebus!

Nicely done. Only thing left to do is to use half angle formula for cosine, and you'll get θ = 2*arctan(1/n)
 Spoiler


Edit: I completely missed the part where you defined your θ as the angle between vector A and -B.

The angle between vector A and B would be equal to [180 - 2*arctan(1/n)] or simply 2*arctan(n)
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: