Congrats eos367.
#41
Actually, the number of possibilities is 65535.
Reply
#42
xBTAx Wrote:I like how you gave her the exact number of possibilities. I wonder what she was thinking after that. XD

"That 10 dollars would have been in my salary *rage* "
Reply
#43
nannerz Wrote:Grats on winning that lol, and kudos on trying to report as she was congratulating you. Too bad she doesn't sound like she cares. Sad

not only did she and gilroy not do anything - I got my Maple Guide "we're too full, try again later" denial the next day.

AngelSL Wrote:Actually, the number of possibilities is 65535.
Actually it's 65536, lets not try to be anal unless we're going to do it right, mkay?
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#44
Actually it's 65537, including the invisible combination possibility.

Amidoinirite?
Reply
#45
Combattente Wrote:Actually it's 65537, including the invisible combination possibility.

Amidoinirite?

No, they took out the possiblility for negative numbers and phantom integers, you FAIL. Tongue1
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#46
eos367 Wrote:No, they took out the possiblility for negative numbers and phantom integers, you FAIL. Tongue1

What about complex numbers? 23i, for example.
Reply
#47
Alloy Wrote:What about complex numbers? 23i, for example.

Don't be silly - Nexon can't even handle simple, they don't use complex.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#48
eos367 Wrote:No, they took out the possiblility for negative numbers and phantom integers, you PHAIL. Tongue1

Fixed that for you. Glitter
Reply
#49
eos367 Wrote:Don't be silly - Nexon can't even handle simple, they don't use complex.

Well, if someone's gonna try to calculate the square root of -1, it's gonna be Nexon.
Reply
#50
Alloy Wrote:Well, if someone's gonna try to calculate the square root of -1, it's gonna be Nexon.

No no. That might be work. They'd recruit volunteeers to do that, but turn away any mathamaticians who applied because that'd make sense.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#51
eos367 Wrote:18 hours to be exact based on latency of having to wait for a response before continuing, if you limit it to a single test at a time, but you can reduce it to three hours by doing it simultaneously in six browsers using different subsets of the sequence.

You'll note I went for the one that was more or less humanly impossible rather than taking the easier ones.

A complete value list was pretty much the only option to go through - They could've activated anything and these weren't a real card - When I cashed it, it pegged as PayPal. That means I had to resort to processing the cartesian value of a four way join to the all the hexidecimal digits.



 Spoiler

:f6:. Wut. Frown.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)