+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+--- Forum: Maplestory Discussion (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=31)
+--- Thread: I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to (/showthread.php?tid=9840)
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - misc86 - 2009-04-02
prevent HT from being hacked every 3 minutes?
Did they fix anything during the SC?
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - crewe127 - 2009-04-02
Yea, 6 hours and 45 minutes of fixing things!
APRIL FOOLS!
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - fearfighterk - 2009-04-02
They patched the dc hack during those few hours so you shouldn't have to worry about it for the next while until someone else finds a way to dc people.
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - y0y0y0y0shi0 - 2009-04-02
fearfighterk Wrote:They patched the dc hack during those few hours so you shouldn't have to worry about it for the next while until someone else finds a way to dc people.
The spam dc one wasn't fixed, though.
And, you shouldn't have "thought" what the SC yesterday was "supposed" to do, because it was never told what it was going to do. You can't just assume something without evidence.
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - Eos - 2009-04-02
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:And, you shouldn't have "thought" what the SC yesterday was "supposed" to do, because it was never told what it was going to do. You can't just assume something without evidence.
So many religion jokes so little time!
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - y0y0y0y0shi0 - 2009-04-03
eos367 Wrote:So many religion jokes so little time!
Lol. And THAT, my dear lady, is why I'm an atheist.
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - haha01haha01 - 2009-04-03
they only fixed the dc hack...
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - Saar331 - 2009-04-03
dam
they better fix more than just one hack in 6hours
faillllll!
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - Eos - 2009-04-03
Saar331 Wrote:dam
they better fix more than just one hack in 6hours
faillllll!
Six hours to apply patches to up to 88 (((19*6)+(13*4))/2) servers and you whine?
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - Saar331 - 2009-04-03
eos367 Wrote:Six hours to apply patches to up to 88 (((19*6)+(13*4))/2) servers and you whine?um,well,uhm what do u mean by this math calculation..
dam well i heard that each patch hacks change and are removed
and gotta be re-made fr newest patch
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - crewe127 - 2009-04-03
eos367 Wrote:Six hours to apply patches to up to 88 (((19*6)+(13*4))/2) servers and you whine?
2 channels per server? O_O
I thought the SC yesterday was suppose to - Eos - 2009-04-03
crewe127 Wrote:2 channels per server? O_O
Yes.
Here's Scania for example:
Scania Server Layout
Note that it's 10 IPs, 9 of which use two different ports with a dedicated server for CH1. They all follow this same schema, so the reduced worlds occupy 7 IPs 6 dual, and 1 dedicated. The more complete servers occupy 10, 9 dual and 1 dedicated. This actually makes the math more accuractely expressed as (6*10) + (4*7) = 88 since the /2 would produce inaccuracies when El Nido is added in.
You can have multiple IPs per physical box, but there's not much point for the layout they're using if they're all on the same machines, unless it's to partition by having multiple copies of the server daemon running on the same box but answering to different IPs. That's unlikely though, since it's a rather convoluted way to cluster.