+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+--- Thread: Comparison. (/showthread.php?tid=7973)
Comparison. - Nikkey - 2009-02-04
For fun:
http://www.quarkbase.com/show/sleepywood.net
http://www.quarkbase.com/show/southperry.net
Look at the traffic. harr. harr.
Comparison. - Spaz - 2009-02-04
lol SP is owned by Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Comparison. - chrome - 2009-02-04
We're below SW in traffic. o_o
Comparison. - Heidi - 2009-02-04
Grats to everybody that appeared on the online list for sp.net one!
Comparison. - z0mgc00k13 - 2009-02-04
Heidi Wrote:Grats to everybody that appeared on the online list for sp.net one!
*looks*hai me
wtp at the ad o.o
Comparison. - Russt - 2009-02-04
lol @ 'Famous in Countries'... they must have an odd definition of famous.
hehe @ dSW/dt being negative. Then again, we pretty much already knew that.
Comparison. - sicnarf - 2009-02-04
Devil's Sunrise Wrote:For fun:
http://www.quarkbase.com/show/sleepywood.net
http://www.quarkbase.com/show/southperry.net
Look at the traffic. harr. harr.
Not surprising, considering the number of users on both sites at any given time.
Comparison. - KajitiSouls - 2009-02-04
Look at that large traffic spike in the summer for sp.net. Wonder what that is... I don't actually wonder.
Comparison. - Heidi - 2009-02-04
The fact that around then was when Southperry.net was born?
And o_O that SS was only taken today, I thought it was older at first
Edit: Oh wait... the spike was a little later. Me bad
Comparison. - ยป-Chris-> - 2009-02-04
Wasn't that crimsonwood?(to above)
Comparison. - JoeTang - 2009-02-04
Heidi Wrote:The fact that around then was when Southperry.net was born?
And o_O that SS was only taken today, I thought it was older at first
Southperry was not born in mid-August.
Comparison. - Heidi - 2009-02-04
Yah, I realised that just now. Corrected it in my post, but too slow
Comparison. - Nikkey - 2009-02-04
Russt Wrote:hehe @ dSW/dt being negative. Then again, we pretty much already knew that.
dSW/dt < dSP/dt which means SP > SW for large values of t.
Comparison. - madanthony - 2009-02-05
I'm trying to piece together the Top 10 visited websites according to those guys.
So far:
*Insert time delay here*
1) yahoo.com
2) google.com (lower than yahoo? lolwut)
3) youtube.com
4) live.com
5) facebook.com
6) msn.com
7) myspace.com
8) wikipedia.org
9) blogger.com
10) yahoo.co.jp
Comparison. - Russt - 2009-02-05
Devil's Sunrise Wrote:dSW/dt < dSP/dt which means SP > SW for large values of t.Indeed.
Comparison. - Thunda - 2009-02-05
madanthony Wrote:I'm trying to piece together the Top 10 visited websites according to those guys.
So far:
*Insert time delay here*
1) yahoo.com
2) google.com (lower than yahoo? lolwut)
3) youtube.com
4) live.com
5) facebook.com
6) msn.com
7) myspace.com
8) wikipedia.org
9) blogger.com
10) yahoo.co.jp
Yahoo is a more sticky site than Google in general because Google has less links (which is a feature for Google, not a bug), but this does contribute to people staying on the Yahoo pages longer. This may contribute to the "most visited" status of Yahoo, depending on how the site counts traffic.