+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+--- Forum: Amherst (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+--- Thread: Maxed Burst Fire & Lv. 1 Rapid Fire (/showthread.php?tid=7941)
Maxed Burst Fire & Lv. 1 Rapid Fire - Stephen - 2009-02-03
QUICK QUESTION!
Is level 1 Rapid Fire stronger than maxed burst fire??
EDIT: thanks guys :]
Maxed Burst Fire & Lv. 1 Rapid Fire - Cavalier - 2009-02-03
Using information from Pirate skill tables, Fourth Job Skill Tables, and Attack Speed Reference.
On something with no defence, Burst Fire Does 210% x 3 x 60000/690 (Picked a random weapon speed) or a little less than 55k%/min.
Level 1 Rapid Fire does 102% x 60000/120 or 51k/min.
Now, I'm less familiar with these things than a lot of people, so I may have gotten something wrong, but as far as I can tell, Maxed Burst Fire is slightly better than Rapid Fire.
I used (3) Weapon Speed for Burst Fire, assuming that base weapon speed would be (5), but if it isn't, Rapid Fire might be better.
Maxed Burst Fire & Lv. 1 Rapid Fire - Corn - 2009-02-03
I think it would take level 5 Rapid Fire to be stronger than Burst Fire.
Maxed Burst Fire & Lv. 1 Rapid Fire - Takebacker - 2009-02-03
In my opinion, rapid fire is better than burst fire around level 15 because of bullet usage. By looking at the % damage output for both skills, rapid fire is about the same as burst fire at level 5.
Maxed Burst Fire & Lv. 1 Rapid Fire - IllegallySane - 2009-02-05
Is it also factoring in weapon defense reduction? I don't care how many hits Rapid Fire does, but because it doesn't crit, it means it'll get raped by damage reduction like Savage Blow.
Maxed Burst Fire & Lv. 1 Rapid Fire - Russt - 2009-02-05
IllegallySane Wrote:Is it also factoring in weapon defense reduction? I don't care how many hits Rapid Fire does, but because it doesn't crit, it means it'll get raped by damage reduction like Savage Blow.If x > y, then (a-b)*x > (a-b)*y
Maxed Burst Fire & Lv. 1 Rapid Fire - IllegallySane - 2009-02-05
Russt Wrote:If x > y, then (a-b)*x > (a-b)*y
I stand corrected.
