+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+--- Thread: Warning, yet intriguing question. (/showthread.php?tid=5947)
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Alloy - 2008-12-03
Before you warn me, read this completely.
WARNING, YOU CAN VIEW A RICKROLLED VIDEO IN THE LINK BELOW.
After reading that, if you clicked this video featuring Rick Astley with a title implying that you got RICKROLLED...
Would it really be a rickroll? You were expecting that particular video instead of another, so it didn't get you offguard... Therefore, the rickroll wouldn't have achieved his goal, therefore making it loose the rank of "prank".
DISCUSS
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Horusmaster - 2008-12-03
lol rickroll sites doesn't work on me anymore because of noscript XD
that youtube video is um.... a rickroll doesn't matter if it caught u offguard or not, u go there, u get rickrolled.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Five Second Pose - 2008-12-03
I rickroll'd someone three times in five minutes once. It was funny.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Fiel - 2008-12-03
No, it's not a rickroll. Because to do a proper rickroll, you must have false or misleading information to make someone want to click on the link. Even a lack of information (such as posting a video link to a fad video in a random topic) could be ruled as a rickroll.
However, if you say, "If you want to see Rick Astley's video, click here", that's not a rickroll at all.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - PKProStudio - 2008-12-03
Fiel Wrote:No, it's not a rickroll. Because to do a proper rickroll, you must have false or misleading information to make someone want to click on the link. Even a lack of information (such as posting a video link to a fad video in a random topic) could be ruled as a rickroll.
However, if you say, "If you want to see Rick Astley's video, click here", that's not a rickroll at all.
BUT... what if they say if you want to see ANOTHER Rick Astley video...
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Five Second Pose - 2008-12-03
Isn't any one of Rick Astley's videos considered a rickroll?
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Alloy - 2008-12-04
Rayquaza2233 Wrote:Isn't any one of Rick Astley's videos considered a rickroll?
Anything that isn't what you expected is a technical rickroll. Even though The "rick" part of the name comes from... Astley :p
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Five Second Pose - 2008-12-04
F'uck yes, that means I can declare even more rickroll war on my friends.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Harrisonized - 2008-12-04
I like the ones that pop up around your screen. Those are the ownage.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Russt - 2008-12-05
Alloy Wrote:Anything that isn't what you expected is a technical rickroll. Even though The "rick" part of the name comes from... Astley :pI believe the original was duckroll?
So really anything that isn't what you expected is a ____roll, depending on what it is/what you want to call it.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - PKProStudio - 2008-12-05
Harrisonized Wrote:I like the ones that pop up around your screen. Those are the ownage.
http://tinyurl.com/64fv5a
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Katie - 2008-12-05
PKProStudio Wrote:http://tinyurl.com/64fv5a
Yano wut, you suck for that. That froze my firefox. Good job.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - PKProStudio - 2008-12-05
You should've expected that.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Katie - 2008-12-05
PKProStudio Wrote:You should've expected that.
I wasn't even paying attention. lol.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - JakeAndBake - 2008-12-05
I guess it is if the person is still dumb enough to click
Warning, yet intriguing question. - randompeep - 2008-12-05
PKProStudio Wrote:http://tinyurl.com/64fv5a
nvm.
Warning, yet intriguing question. - Mashi - 2008-12-05
Damn them smart ass RickRollers for solving the Source Code viewer trick with Php
