+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+--- Thread: Which is more believable? (/showthread.php?tid=48999)
Which is more believable? - Unauthorized Intruder - 2011-11-20
Situation:
You go into a remote island never been explored by anyone. Few months later, you come back to the civilization with a supernatural power. Which is more believable reason:
- Spiritual life-form never been referred by any culture gave you this power and claim you are destined to destroy the universe.
- Genetic mutation that has same chance of occurrence as winning the first prize lottery, 2 times in a row.
Which is more believable? - Corn - 2011-11-20
Is there radiation on the island?
Which is more believable? - Raph589 - 2011-11-20
2nd one.
Which is more believable? - Unauthorized Intruder - 2011-11-20
Corn Wrote:Is there radiation on the island?
no.
Which is more believable? - Bomber - 2011-11-20
Unauthorized Intruder Wrote:no.Second one.
When I hear no for radiation I hear yes for radiation.
Likewise when I hear yes I hear yes.
Which is more believable? - DeanNim - 2011-11-20
2nd one of course
Which is more believable? - Flonne - 2011-11-20
Realistically, neither. Unless there is a crazy solar wind that causes unknown fallout or something, that mutates the entire population of earth, not just the person on the island. That's not realistic either, though!
Unauthorized Intruder Wrote:destined to destroy the universeITS ON NOW CHAPS, PUT YOUR GUNS ON
Which is more believable? - Luxeraph - 2011-11-20
I'll go with the first one, spontaneous mutation without any radioactive source sounds a bit hard to belive.
Which is more believable? - JoeTang - 2011-11-20
Subtle religion vs science thread.
Which is more believable? - HellenzSin - 2011-11-20
Unauthorized Intruder Wrote:- Genetic mutation that has same chance of occurrence as winning the first prize lottery, 2 times in a row.