![]() |
|
Clarification - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +--- Thread: Clarification (/showthread.php?tid=32037) |
Clarification - Zelkova - 2010-10-29 Most of you already know this, but just to be clear.
Clarification - Link - 2010-10-29 You have that backwards there. Clarification - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-10-29 .
Clarification - Solarboy - 2010-10-29 .
Clarification - CrazyNomad - 2010-10-29 ![]() c Clarification - Erebus - 2010-10-29 CrazyNomad Wrote:*snip* i don't get it Clarification - Zelkova - 2010-10-29 Solarboy Wrote: thats awesome. Clarification - Mute - 2010-10-29 Zelkova Wrote:thats awesome. but WHY is it awesome? Clarification - Zelkova - 2010-10-29 Mute Wrote:but WHY is it awesome? Squiggley arms. Clarification - Mute - 2010-10-29 Zelkova Wrote:Unrealistic arms. not buyin' it. Clarification - larmie - 2010-10-29 Mute Wrote:not buyin' it. Reminds us of Mission Impossible? Sometimes I wonder what the correct spelling of made-up words are. Is it "potential-ed" or "potentialled"? The latter seems more natural but linguistically it's the former. /beingsrs Clarification - Unauthorized Intruder - 2010-10-29 larmie Wrote:Reminds us of Mission Impossible? Word potential is a noun or adjective, formally. In this case it would be like ninja in "I'll go ninja on your ass". So neither of those is correct. Clarification - Dusk - 2010-10-29 potential'd |