![]() |
|
SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Forum: Maple Q&A (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=29) +--- Thread: SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? (/showthread.php?tid=30488) |
SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - UniBoy - 2010-09-16 Is thorns still better for warriors ( Arans to be specific ) or will SE be better? Thx in advance SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - Dusk - 2010-09-16 Both. SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - Takebacker - 2010-09-16 Dusk Wrote:Both. This. SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - UniBoy - 2010-09-16 Dusk Wrote:Both. As in same dmg and % and everything? SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - ArbalistMaster - 2010-09-16 as in they stack. SE gives criticalmaxdamage and thorns gives criticalmindamage. not sure if the probabilities stack though SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - shouri - 2010-09-16 They both raise the range of your critical damage in different aspects, so yes, they stack. One raises the maximum your crits can do, the other raises the minimum that your crits deal. SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - Dusk - 2010-09-16 They stack and both increase your damage by the same amount. SE vs. Thorn Post BB for warriors? - Kalovale - 2010-09-16 Elaborating: Dusk Wrote:They stack and both increase your damage by the same amount. SE: 120~180% -> 150% on avg Thorns: 150~150% -> ... SE + Thorns: 150~180% (though I'm not yet sure on this) |