+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+--- Thread: -f4- Southperry (/showthread.php?tid=27538)
-f4- Southperry - Link - 2010-07-12
-f4- Southperry - ★★★★★ - 2010-07-12
theres a new posts button and you abuse it? WHERE?
-f4- Southperry - Hanabira.Kage - 2010-07-12
Hmm...
![[Image: newpostss.png]](http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/9821/newpostss.png)
Ooh! Steak!
How on Earth do you hit that thing unintentionally? ._.
EDIT: *Looks up* OMG! It's the steak guy! :x
Ooh! Steak!
How on Earth do you hit that thing unintentionally? ._.
EDIT: *Looks up* OMG! It's the steak guy! :x
-f4- Southperry - Link - 2010-07-12
This was actually the very first time I've ever gotten that message on Southperry. Usually, I just get posts that aren't bolded when I hit "New Posts."
-f4- Southperry - Hazzy - 2010-07-12
Why are these images being resized. . . . :|
I get this every now and then, although I usually hit "Mark Forums Read" after no one post in a while. I don't like dead weight in my New Post Results Page.
-f4- Southperry - Kalovale - 2010-07-12
Hazzy Wrote:Why are these images being resized. . . . :|
It's the width.
-f4- Southperry - Hazzy - 2010-07-12
Hanabira's image is really wide, but the others aren't. I could fit two, side by side, in my window and still have room for more in my post. I don't have that high of a resolution, or even wide screen, either.
-f4- Southperry - Kalovale - 2010-07-12
Hazzy Wrote:Hanabira's image is really wide, but the others aren't. I could fit two, side by side, in my window and still have room for more in my post. I don't have that high of a resolution, or even wide screen, either.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that the threshold for width is 600 pixels.
-f4- Southperry - Hazzy - 2010-07-12
![[Image: 599by80something.png]](http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5506330/599by80something.png)
:|
599 by 83.
-f4- Southperry - Kalovale - 2010-07-12
Nevermind.
-f4- Southperry - Jon - 2010-07-12
e_e I receive this way too much. But by 8am, it's usually busier around here.
-f4- Southperry - Eos - 2010-07-12
Kalovale Wrote:I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that the threshold for width is 600 pixels.
450, as I said in the Images thread.
-f4- Southperry - Kalovale - 2010-07-12
Eosian Wrote:450, as I said in the Images thread.
![[Image: 87954467.png]](http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/2345/87954467.png)
-f6-
-f4- Southperry - Rob - 2010-07-12
lol pwnt
-f4- Southperry - Eos - 2010-07-12
Rob Wrote: lol pwnt
No, that image is 1,281 x 421 pixels which is well outside the 800x450.
-f4- Southperry - Kalovale - 2010-07-12
Eosian Wrote:No, that image is 1,281 x 421 pixels which is well outside the 800x450.
That image says you didn't mention the size, but it isn't a big deal.
-f4- Southperry - Eos - 2010-07-12
*ponder*
http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php?t=29005&p=486608&viewfull=1#post486608
I know I included the exact dimensions somewhere too. Must've been when talking to Mira.
-f4- Southperry - Rob - 2010-07-12
Haha, yeah, it's all good.
-f4- Southperry - Corn - 2010-07-12
Happens to me a lot. I mean, A LOT.
I'm too addicted to Southperry.