![]() |
|
Which Explorer/Adventurer ring is better for sin? - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Forum: Training Center (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Forum: Thief (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +---- Thread: Which Explorer/Adventurer ring is better for sin? (/showthread.php?tid=26696) |
Which Explorer/Adventurer ring is better for sin? - waltobc6 - 2010-06-18 Which Explorer/Adventurer ring is better for sin? the 3wa, 5% chance, 20% dmg or the 2wa, 10% chance, 10% dmg. Which Explorer/Adventurer ring is better for sin? - Cavalier - 2010-06-18 Go with the 10% chance, 10% damage. the 1 w. att will help less than the extra 5% crit rate. Which Explorer/Adventurer ring is better for sin? - waltobc6 - 2010-06-18 Cavalier Wrote:Go with the 10% chance, 10% damage. the 1 w. att will help less than the extra 5% crit rate. i think like you but what others thinks? Which Explorer/Adventurer ring is better for sin? - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-06-18 Its been said before. Any class that naturally has a critical skill or whatever should go with the critical ring. Higher chances of hitting criticals equals higher dps. Which Explorer/Adventurer ring is better for sin? - Stereo - 2010-06-18 The Cruel ring is in fact better for assassins, by about 0.5%, due to 1 extra w.atk. This is only due to their relatively low base crit rate though -- if they have SE, then the Critical ring is indisputably better.. The Critical Ring is far more practical. I'd recommend the Critical ring to anybody who will kill a monster, at any point, ever, with any party. |