![]() |
|
Unfair non-infraction - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +--- Thread: Unfair non-infraction (/showthread.php?tid=16389) Pages:
1
2
|
Unfair non-infraction - Russt - 2009-09-15 Spam 1 Spam 2 (I honestly don't even remember what I was thinking when I posted this... I think I got the wrong thread) Spam 3 Spam 4 Spam 5 Spam 6 Spam 7 B>tempban status.
Unfair non-infraction - Corn - 2009-09-15 Sean's on my case, and infracted all of mine already, ha ha. Unfair non-infraction - Fiel - 2009-09-15 Code: if(IsUserJoking(FetchUser("Russt")) == TRUE)Unfair non-infraction - FelixTM - 2009-09-15 But without any "spam" this would be a much more boring site. It's not like people are going around posting something in EVERY thread or babbling nonsense (besides Chompy). Spam is too loosely defined, though this site actually isn't too Nazi about it. Take it easy, guys. Take it easy. Unfair non-infraction - Corn - 2009-09-15 FelixTM Wrote:But without any "spam" this would be a much more boring site. It's not like people are going around posting something in EVERY thread or babbling nonsense (besides Chompy). Spam is too loosely defined, though this site actually isn't too Nazi about it. Looks like someone wasn't here around 3 hours earlier. Unfair non-infraction - FelixTM - 2009-09-15 ClawofBeta Wrote:Looks like someone wasn't here around 3 hours earlier. What I miss? Unfair non-infraction - Corn - 2009-09-15 This was originally in General Maplestory. Unfair non-infraction - Russt - 2009-09-15 Spam 8 Unfair non-infraction - FelixTM - 2009-09-15 Nah, I saw that. How's that relevant to what I was saying? She's always silly like that. Unfair non-infraction - Greg22 - 2009-09-15 "Infractions are nothing to worry about and can't really be disputed." FALSE Unfair non-infraction - TøbiasBlack - 2009-09-15 i dont get #4... Unfair non-infraction - Shippo the Fox - 2009-09-15 tobiasblack Wrote:i dont get #4... so zetta slow! Unfair non-infraction - Providence - 2009-09-15 In my opinion, the only one that would be considered spam-worthy is number 7. ![]() Greg Wrote:"Infractions are nothing to worry about and can't really be disputed."What Greg said. I would know, too, as I've seen him write two freaking ESSAYS regarding certain infractions. Unfair non-infraction - Cancambo - 2009-09-16 Providence Wrote:In my opinion, the only one that would be considered spam-worthy is number 7. You should infract him for making you read an essay. Unfair non-infraction - Russt - 2009-09-16 Fiel Wrote:Just noticed; comparing stuff to TRUE is redundant.
Unfair non-infraction - Derimed - 2009-09-16 Providence Wrote:What Greg said. I would know, too, as I've seen him write two freaking ESSAYS regarding certain infractions. I don't see why Greg would even dispute infractions, they are what he is known and loved for.
Unfair non-infraction - FelixTM - 2009-09-16 TehMatt Wrote:You should infract him for making you read an essay. More like reward him. Greg, I am impressed. Unfair non-infraction - Derimed - 2009-09-16 FelixTM Wrote:More like reward him. Essays are educashunal.
Unfair non-infraction - Cancambo - 2009-09-16 Quantact Wrote:Essays are educashunal. But what about the lulz? WHAT ABOUT THE LULZ?! Unfair non-infraction - Swerve - 2009-09-16 Some infractions give people infarction. |