Southperry.net
Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - Printable Version

+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+--- Forum: Training Center (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+--- Thread: Night Lords and Sharp Eyes (/showthread.php?tid=16363)



Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - ¥-Striker-¥ - 2009-09-15

Default Critical : 50% chance of doing +100% damage
Critical With SE
+15% , + 40% damage

a) 65% chance of doing +140% (Triple Throw Critical = 150% + 140% = 290%)
OR
b) 65% chance of doing 140% [Triple Throw Critical = 150% + 100% (default critical) + 140% (SE's critical) = 390%]
OR
c) 65% chance of doing 140% x (150% + 100%) = 350%

A or B or C ?


Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - Devil - 2009-09-15

¥-Striker-¥ Wrote:Default Critical : 50% chance of doing +100% damage
Critical With SE
+15% , + 40% damage

a) 65% chance of doing +140% (Triple Throw Critical = 150% + 140% = 290%)
OR
b) 65% chance of doing 140% [Triple Throw Critical = 150% + 100% (default critical) + 140% (SE's critical) = 390%]
OR
c) 65% chance of doing 140% x (150% + 100%) = 350%

A or B or C ?
- For Night Lords: 65% Chance of doing 150+100+140= 390%
- For Night Walkers: 65% Chance of doing 140+100+140= 380%


Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - ¥-Striker-¥ - 2009-09-15

Is this 200% confirmed?
Coz if it is NLs are gods with SE.
sorry christians.


Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - Takebacker - 2009-09-15

Devil Wrote:390% * 4.5 = 390%

What.


Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - ¥-Striker-¥ - 2009-09-15

I think he meant 390% * 3 hits * 1.5 (Shadow Partner) = 1755%
Right?


Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - CarrionCrow - 2009-09-15

I thought it was already common knowledge SE+NL spell overpower?


Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - Dusk - 2009-09-15

¥-Striker-¥ Wrote:Is this 200% confirmed?
Coz if it is NLs are gods with SE.
sorry christians.

Yeah, it's confirmed. This is why everyone says NLs suck without SE.


Night Lords and Sharp Eyes - Devil - 2009-09-15

Takebacker Wrote:What.
Wanted to explain it more, but decided that it would get too complicated for just answering this specific question.

I forgot to remove it, fixed now! Smile