![]() |
|
What is nothing? - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Rubik's Cube (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Thread: What is nothing? (/showthread.php?tid=11895) |
What is nothing? - SethElite - 2009-06-02 So today in fourth period I was pretty bored and was just thinking random stuff when I got this... In my personal opinion the only reason that humans are able to interact with each other in the way we do is because of our individuality. If there was no individuality everyone would be the same, thus meaning that everyone would no everything about everyone else. There would be no curiosity, and you could then hardy call any interaction that we would have interaction by todays definition. This brings me to my next point, we are consciously individual, we understand that we are different and this is where curiosity stems from. If individuality was subconscious, then the same scenario I outlined in the first point would take place due to our individuality being an open book for all to read at their whim.. This means that we can choose how to make ourselves individual, and it is not just pre-determined when we are born. It is thought that what makes us who we are is the collective experiences that transpire during our life that our brains record as electronic signals, meaning that everything we perceive is actually just impulses of electricity. Next, as previously stated we get our individuality from events that transpire though out our lives, not from another individuality. Therefore there is no original individuality, a stand alone complex. If our individuality is a stand alone complex then our consciousness must not be consciousness at all and a copy of nothing. Nothing is nothing no matter how you look at it, meaning that a copy of nothing is still nothing. Human consciousness does not exist, we are just a collective unconsciousness acting conscious though any means necessary. If we are a collective unconciousness of either one or multiple beings acting as seperate conciousnesses what does that make nothing, since we obviously are concious in some state that means that nothing must therefore be something since without something there would be no consciousness at all, real or fake. The collective subconscious that we are must be striving to be something... But what... What is nothing? I figure that due to the fact that all of our thoughts, emotions, and memory are just electronic signals it is quite possible that we are all just computer programs in some unconscious supercomputer that is really everything that ever has, ever will, and does exist. Nothingness is just a glitch in this supercomputer. Our individuality is, although it seems to be in our full control more likely than not has been planned out for an infinite amount of time. Time as I see it is just the human perception of events transpiring around us, and as such since we are all programs in this super computer which has existed for an infinite amount of time and will always continue to exist even long after all the matter and energy is gone from our universe must have something above it, otherwise it would have no perception of time. Without its perception of time we would have no perception of time and thus would create a paradox. There is an infinite loop of these supercomputers looped together in a subnet that stretched though out all dimensions of space, time, and all the other random crap we have yet to discover within our corner of the subnet. But what exists beyond it all? Anything? Infinity is a great great number but nothing is truly infinite, there must be a single point from which it all began. What is this single point, what we could possibly call nothingness? This would then imply that everything is nothing, and nothing is everything, we do not even exist. True nothingness as we define it. But as I stated previously everything is nothing and nothing is everything. This true nothingness must the the true everything. There is no such thing as nothingness or everything, it all just is. You may argue something to do with God, but I am infact an athiest and i believe the same rules I have layed out here would also apply to God if he was real, he would just be nothing trying to be something, even without any idea of what that something must be. Discuss? Ya ya, I know, tl;dr
What is nothing? - MasPan - 2009-06-02 SethElite Wrote:So today in fourth period I was pretty bored and was just thinking random stuff when I got this... Gods or godlike beings would be hackers in this metaphor (they have the power to manipulate the "supercomputer" at will, or at least to a high degree), and I'm going to say chaotic events (natural disasters, wars, etc) would be viruses, caused either directly by the hacker or by programming decay. Interesting way to view the world, but I personally stick to my belief that everything is in and of itself a figment of my imagination. What is nothing? - Beserker101 - 2009-06-02 Whaaaa? I had to read that a second time to begin to understand (but in my defense, I did begin thinking about how I could make a crab on fantasticContraption), anyways:
Spoiler
That is nothing. What is nothing? - Veneni - 2009-06-02 I see your point. The universe is like a giant computer, and the programming is the laws of physics and the objects in the computer code is matter/waves. The programm running would be a computer simulation called "Universe". I don't really see the point you're making about individuality though. You seem to think it's something like a rock, that is passed on from one to another: One gains, but the other one loses. If so then indeed: There should have been a rock from the beginning, but there wasn't, so all rocks are just nonexistent. But I see individuality more like a teacher giving points: The student receives, but the teacher didn't lose anything. IMO Individuality = The way your brain works and makes connections. Everyones brain works differently, so everyones an individual. After an event, there are more bridges created in our brain, sculpting our individual. But that doesn't mean there were bridges broken down in another person's brain. Quote:Human consciousness does not exist, we are just a collective unconsciousness acting conscious though any means necessary.Indeed, you could look at the world as a clump of matter in a computer code, which started to behave really odd. If you start thinking about the why you could bring Darwin into the picture: Clumps of matter accently became organized and reproductive and then by natural selection and mutations, you know how it works, the earth was full of clumps of matter that we now call life. But that doesn't change the fact they are still just a collection of strangely interacting objects in the computersimulation "universe". Conciousness is not something the programming does, it's just a side-effect from it. Darwin again: The clumps of matter that "thought" they were concious had the upper hand: Their interaction and creativity and thinking abilities clearly were a lot of help since we now rule the world. I see your point we could be considered little programms of our own, in which the simulation would only be a tiny amount of matter but constructed in a very specified order. Quote:But what... What is nothing?I agree until the last sentance. No idea where that was coming from... A glitch in my idea of the universe-computer would be something defying the laws of physics. Why can't nothingness be a part of the computer? Quote:Our individuality is, although it seems to be in our full control more likely than not has been planned out for an infinite amount of time. Time as I see it is just the human perception of events transpiring around us, and as such since we are all programs in this super computer which has existed for an infinite amount of time and will always continue to exist even long after all the matter and energy is gone from our universe must have something above it, otherwise it would have no perception of time. Without its perception of time we would have no perception of time and thus would create a paradox.I can't agree on that: We use the example "the universe is a computer" but that doesn't neccesairely make it true. Before the big bang, there was no time, nor space. It's useless to think "before the big bang" or " beyond our universe". It's the same as saying "wat's north of the north pole". You see a computer as a thing, with matter, and parts that move (time). That all doesn't exist outside our universe. You could say, when the universe was created, the same time the computer was. As what created our universe, we'll never know. It doesn't require an intelligent action. Take for example the earth and creaton of life again: It just grew to existance by accident, without any intelligent creator. Quote:This would then imply that everything is nothing, and nothing is everything, we do not even exist. True nothingness as we define it. But as I stated previously everything is nothing and nothing is everything. This true nothingness must the the true everything. There is no such thing as nothingness or everything, it all just is.I still don't understand your definition of nothingness, or what you are saying here. Can you explain a bit more? I think you mean, like in the real world, a computer simulation is just a simulation, so the world that it creates is just calculations in the computer. But like I said the computer-theory is just a theory, a thing to understand the world better by connecting exact physics/physics to (equally) exact computerscience. So my conclusion is: Nothingness is "The thing north of the north pole". lulz What is nothing? - holyforest - 2009-06-18 If you want a pure example of nothing, go in a space shuttle into a universal vacuum. That is nothing. No sound or anything. Pure black darkness. What is nothing? - Roxas - 2009-06-19 I've always defined the term "Nothing" as the lack of presence of both Matter and Energy. What is nothing? - Nikkey - 2009-06-19 SethElite Wrote:I figure that due to the fact that all of our thoughts, emotions, and memory are just electronic signals it is quite possible that we are all just computer programs in some unconscious supercomputer that is really everything that ever has, ever will, and does exist. Nothingness is just a glitch in this supercomputer. Our individuality is, although it seems to be in our full control more likely than not has been planned out for an infinite amount of time. Time as I see it is just the human perception of events transpiring around us, and as such since we are all programs in this super computer which has existed for an infinite amount of time and will always continue to exist even long after all the matter and energy is gone from our universe must have something above it, otherwise it would have no perception of time. Without its perception of time we would have no perception of time and thus would create a paradox. There is an infinite loop of these supercomputers looped together in a subnet that stretched though out all dimensions of space, time, and all the other random crap we have yet to discover within our corner of the subnet. But what exists beyond it all? Anything? Infinity is a great great number but nothing is truly infinite, there must be a single point from which it all began. What is this single point, what we could possibly call nothingness? It's been proven that the world today isn't sharp. That means you cannot compute, even with the highest calculations in the world, how the world is going to be. Thus, for us humans (as of right now), the world isn't predetermined. It doesn't matter whether the world is in fact predetermined or not, because we're unable to calculate and find out if it actually is. That's the first thing. The second thing, we haven't existed for an infinite amount of time. We existed since Big Bang. And really, you cannot say that our life is "planned out" by a supercomputer, as a supercomputer can't think. (Saying computers can think is like saying that submarines can swim.) Besides, humans made the concept computer. And the computer has tons of limitations. A way of actually saying that the world is a lot of threads and processes within a supercomputer, means that someone made that computer and ordered it to do this and that. If that is true, then the thing or being which made this computer is our ***, which collides with your belief. Nothingness is a concept made by mathematicians, and will never exist in our world: http://www.defmacro.org/ramblings/fp.html Wrote:Fire up the time machine. Our walk in the park took place more than two thousand years ago, on a beautiful sunny day of a long forgotten spring in 380 B.C. Outside the city walls of Athens, under the pleasant shade of olive trees Plato was walking towards the Academy with a beautiful slave boy. The weather was lovely, the dinner was filling, and the conversation turned to philosophy. Thus the example holyforest came up with turns out to be false as well: A universal vacuum will consist of radiation, a ton of temporarily existing particles, black matter, photons, etc. tl;dr Nature's imagination is far greater than mankind's imagination. What is nothing? - Russt - 2009-06-19 Absolute nothingness is useless. But the notion of nothingness in a relative sense is everywhere. "There is nothing good to eat in this place." "Nothing the natives had was able to cure the disease." "Nothing in this city is more than ten stories tall." i.e. nil: the absence of a meaningful value. |