+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+--- Thread: Does SP really have that many lurkers? (/showthread.php?tid=11743)
Pages:
1
2
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Greg22 - 2009-05-27
I was pretty bored, blankly staring at my monitor while I was on SP's General Maplestory board, and I started looking at the viewcounts. That MSea one had 10k and I was like oh man that's a lot of views, and then I looked at the Time Temple thread which was created YESTERDAY and it had like 2k views! hot dayum!
Intrigued, I skedaddled on down to sleepymorningwood and compared the viewcounts of General Maplestory boards, and we actually have MOAR LURKERS. What makes SP a better source of Maple information?
Also, I believe this image holds relevance to the topic at hand.
Spoiler
![[Image: 2dadpnk.jpg]](http://i44.tinypic.com/2dadpnk.jpg)
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - ItachiPower - 2009-05-27
Do I count as a lurker?
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Greg22 - 2009-05-27
no
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - JoeTang - 2009-05-27
Thanks Greg.
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Pomegranate - 2009-05-27
greg your sig is pwn and you spoiler pic is WIN
that be all
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - madanthony - 2009-05-27
Worst scenario: In a few months, all those lurkers stop lurking and start posting. Stupid pomegranate as far as the eye can see. Then you cry yourself to sleep regretting your observation.
Best scenario: You cry yourself to sleep for my own amusement. And post another pic.
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - y0y0y0y0shi0 - 2009-05-27
madanthony Wrote:worst scenario: In a few months, all those lurkers stop lurking and start posting. Stupid pomegranate as far as the eye can see. Then you cry yourself to sleep regretting your observation.
Best scenario: You cry yourself to sleep for my own amusement. And post another pic.
sleepymorningwoods shall not come to the southperry!
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - MetaSeraphim - 2009-05-27
But. . . but. . . they already did in the past. . .
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - y0y0y0y0shi0 - 2009-05-27
MetaSeraphim Wrote:But. . . but. . . they already did in the past. . .
Oh....noes! END OF ZE WORLDZ!!!!!!!!111111111
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Corn - 2009-05-27
They have more lurkers...
Right now, they have 215 members and 295 guests...we have 55 members and 63 guests...
MATH!
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - IllegallySane - 2009-05-27
Why hello there spoiler pic.
madanthony Wrote:Worst scenario: In a few months, all those lurkers stop lurking and start posting. Stupid pomegranate as far as the eye can see. Then you cry yourself to sleep regretting your observation.
Best scenario: You cry yourself to sleep for my own amusement. And post another pic.
THAT MUST NEVER HAPPEN. I'LL RAGEQUIT WHEN THAT HAPPENS!1
*WAIT. IS THAT LINK RULE-63ED?! Hmmmmmm. Meh. Hello there Link.
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Holypie - 2009-05-27
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:sleepymorningwoods shall not come to the southperry!
most of southperrys old members come from sleepywood...
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - VladTheLvr - 2009-05-27
Im always in Lurk mode. I always appear offline.
*Morphs from hydrolisk to lurker.
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Fiel - 2009-05-27
ndynslvr Wrote:Im always in Lurk mode. I always appear offline.
Admins can pierce invisibility.
Greg Wrote:derp
Do I count as a lurker?
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Greg22 - 2009-05-27
no
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Mark - 2009-05-27
Moar of female Link.
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Derimed - 2009-05-27
ClawofBeta Wrote:They have more lurkers...
Right now, they have 215 members and 295 guests...we have 55 members and 63 guests...
MATH!
SW is better known and older. However, there's a lot of things wrong with it and they don't hesitate to perma ANYBODY. The staff is often rude, and even to my casual eyes Adura plays favorites; in a thread where they were trolling women (all women) Adura told one of the trolls named so and so to message him or he'd have to perma the guy. In SW most people just get permaed, and for MUCH less.
I post on SW here and there but I am not a huge fan. And if they perma ME for saying naughty things about SW on another forum, I wouldn't put it past them. Not that I'd care much. It would be like being banned from a cow's ass.
Edit: Epic $hit they were talking about another forum. *shoots self*
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Zaotsu - 2009-05-27
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]Well lets see we have...
1 member with more than 3000 posts.
4 members with more than 2000 posts.
24 members with more than 1000 posts.
38 members with more than 750 posts.
58 members with more than 500 posts.
126 members with more than 250 posts
275 members with more than 100 posts.
421 members with more than 50 posts.
646 members with more than 25 posts.
2105 members with more than 0 posts.
I mean if we have 1.5k people who registered and didn't post, how many others just come to the site and haven't bothered to make an account. I think SP is even linked in some Korean / Japanese blogs.[/COLOR]
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Hypermug - 2009-05-27
Quantact Wrote:SW is better known and older. However, there's a lot of things wrong with it and they don't hesitate to perma ANYBODY. The staff is often rude, and even to my casual eyes Adura plays favorites; in a thread where they were trolling women (all women) Adura told one of the trolls named so and so to message him or he'd have to perma the guy. In SW most people just get permaed, and for MUCH less.
I post on SW here and there but I am not a huge fan. And if they perma ME for saying naughty things about SW on another forum, I wouldn't put it past them. Not that I'd care much. It would be like being banned from a cow's ass.
Edit: Epic $hit they were talking about another forum. *shoots self*
Spoiler
I like lurking~
Does SP really have that many lurkers? - Providence - 2009-05-27
Quantact Wrote:SW is better known and older. However, there's a lot of things wrong with it and they don't hesitate to perma ANYBODY. The staff is often rude, and even to my casual eyes Adura plays favorites; in a thread where they were trolling women (all women) Adura told one of the trolls named so and so to message him or he'd have to perma the guy. In SW most people just get permaed, and for MUCH less.While I really don't have many great things to say about the second generation of the SW administration team (save for a couple moderators), Fiel has already voiced his desire to keep forum-bashing to a minimum. However, I don't believe the thread you're referring to was meant to be taken for anything more than humor, crude as it may seem.