Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Printable Version

+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+--- Thread: Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this (/showthread.php?tid=17183)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Mark - 2009-10-05

Goddamn censor.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - FrozNlite - 2009-10-05

Mark Wrote:Rightous.

Anyway when you're done being serious about this entire thread's existence feel free to come back. You should leave for now though.

Thanks :]. Back. And for you and other internet animu lovers, I brought you this:

Spoiler

Enjoy your fap fap!

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Five Second Pose - 2009-10-05

I approve of Firefox even more now.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Mark - 2009-10-05

Furry.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Five Second Pose - 2009-10-05

Does not qualify as furry due to not being covered in fur.

madanthony Wrote:God, I'd never leave the house.

Well, you'd be stuck in the plant, so.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Providence - 2009-10-05

FrozNlite Wrote:Interesting; last I check people debate here all the time. Want to read what I say for once? The last quote I had defines this: debating is fun; conversation otherwise is boring.

You're "debating" an opinion.

Quote:I'm not going to fore go challenging controversies and defending my contentions just because people are too incompetent to communicate without sarcasm.

you Wrote::]. But alas, this is the funhouse, so what is one to do? I'll throw in my two cents of reality, let you guys pick them and my defenses apart, and three days later when the whole thing is forgotten another one will be posted.

I think I much prefer talking with sarcastic people than people who fail to realize that they're not infallible. I figure "reality" as you use it to pretty much mean "I'm right and you're not".

P.S. I'm jacking off to this discussion.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Mark - 2009-10-05

The limbs, ears and tail are enough for me to declare furry.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Five Second Pose - 2009-10-05

Mark Wrote:The limbs, ears and tail are enough for me to declare furry.

Weak furry.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Mark - 2009-10-05

FURRY IS FURRY.

c

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - gum - 2009-10-05

futafox is better

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - SlayerZach - 2009-10-05

Mark Wrote:FURRY IS FURRY.

c

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - madanthony - 2009-10-05

FrozNlite Wrote:Interesting; last I check people debate here all the time. Want to read what I say for once? The last quote I had defines this: debating is fun; conversation otherwise is boring. I'm not going to fore go challenging controversies and defending my contentions just because people are too incompetent to communicate without sarcasm.

I lol'd. Can't say I've read the last few pages that led to this, but that only kinda helps my point, but the fact that I'm making a point undermines my point, riddle me that.

When we "debate" - and you're right, we frequently do... sort of - it's generally with the understanding that we won't be changing any minds through reason and evidence, or anything else. No one should take anyone very seriously, and therefore anything they say. It's really just a fun-flavored clusterpineapple of us passing the time with a whole bunch of

Spoiler

style arguments and ad hominids, frequently at the expense of people who don't pick up on this or go out of their way to make asses of themselves (i.e. shroum and mars respectively) which really doesn't make it debate at all.

[SIZE="3"]tl;dr[/SIZE]
Thanks for the fap fap. It's nice.

Furry=/=semi-human. There's a line. It hasn't been crossed. Getting there, but not quite.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Mark - 2009-10-05

That's where I draw the line. I'm outtie.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Five Second Pose - 2009-10-05

Mark Wrote:FURRY IS FURRY.

c

Got me there.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - madanthony - 2009-10-05

Zach has crossed my furry line.

GROSS

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Providence - 2009-10-05

Mark Wrote:That's where I draw the line. I'm outtie.

The only way outta this thread is in a box, foo'.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - SlayerZach - 2009-10-05

madanthony Wrote:Zach has crossed my furry line.

GROSS

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Corn - 2009-10-05

Uh...Prov...you're kinda supposed to debate opinions.

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Providence - 2009-10-05

ClawofBeta Wrote:Uh...Prov...you're kinda supposed to debate opinions.

With the mindset that yours is the only one that matters? I don't think that's how it works. I wasn't pointing out that debating based on personal choice is wrong; I was simply reminding him what this "argument" (used loosely) is about.

That being said, TO BIOLOGY!

Zach's plant-whoring gf is gonna kill me for this - Nikkey - 2009-10-05

FrozNlite Wrote:Yea...Post a Picture [V.1]:

I guess I'll post mine then:
[imgspoiler]http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/2728/kronprinshaakon.jpg[/imgspoiler]

ehh. zzz. I suppose you understand what I meant by that.

FrozNlite Wrote:Even better, he's a Buccaneer and I'm a LOLFP. A LOLFP who can get 100m EXP/hr soloing on 4x and has access to HS and 2x buffs whenever needed.

Translation: If you want to argue irony between my level and my statement "GO OUTSIDE," then I can call you out on every instance where you claim Lv. 200 Magicians require no work and are super easy to make.

First off: How is that even comparable? We may argue about your statement without bringing ourselves in. Some of us think it's weird for people that have used a lot of hours on a game to comment in a rather trolly way about something that's most likely way more common than what he thinks, when most other people think it's way more waste of time to play to level 200 on MapleStory.

Second: From 120 when you weren't able to get as much as 100 m/hr, it would take you 403 hours to get to 200 assuming you got 100 m/hr. Assuming Mark gain 50 mill exp/hr, he would have to use 173 hours in order to get to his level. Therefore, your argument isn't even valid.

FrozNlite Wrote:Who wouldn't defend themselves when their ideas or character are brought to question? Yes, I am awfully defensive, and as that's a simple fact, I'm awaiting your logic.

Paul Graham Wrote:The prohibition will be strongest when the group is nervous. The irony of Galileo's situation was that he got in trouble for repeating Copernicus's ideas. Copernicus himself didn't. In fact, Copernicus was a canon of a cathedral, and dedicated his book to the pope. But by Galileo's time the church was in the throes of the Counter-Reformation and was much more worried about unorthodox ideas.

To launch a taboo, a group has to be poised halfway between weakness and power. A confident group doesn't need taboos to protect it. It's not considered improper to make disparaging remarks about Americans, or the English. And yet a group has to be powerful enough to enforce a taboo. Coprophiles, as of this writing, don't seem to be numerous or energetic enough to have had their interests promoted to a lifestyle.

I suspect the biggest source of moral taboos will turn out to be power struggles in which one side only barely has the upper hand. That's where you'll find a group powerful enough to enforce taboos, but weak enough to need them.