Niernen Wrote:MetaSeraphim; Being only able to quote to speak seems like an odd restriction, if no one says anything you want you can't quote anything (unless you quote word by word or something). I don't think that would really be a role restriction, especially since you said hi at the start fine.

xBTAx Wrote:that

TheBirds Wrote:before

xBTAx Wrote:the game

Chaz Wrote:started

Niernen Wrote:Sorry about the double, was quoting Shidoshi and forgot to edit the first post...

Also, the name thing seems to be about trust. Are you willing to give out your name and let others see who you are? or do you want to keep it a secret for some reason? I'm Lisa Heart.

Sega; You may want to speak up, or its possible you would get lynched off first day again, which seems like a waste. No point in plying if you say nothing and die.

MetaSeraphim; Being only able to quote to speak seems like an odd restriction, if no one says anything you want you can't quote anything (unless you quote word by word or something). I don't think that would really be a role restriction, especially since you said hi at the start fine.

(just started reading BTOOOM! yesterday and some of the trust problems they mentioned reminded me of this game).

Shidoshi Wrote:if they are able to vote.

Shidoshi Wrote:Kyrastri; "raising the stakes" on someone early makes a lot more sense than doing so later in the Day, that way there's more time for discussion and for votes to be changed if we feel later that there's another person more suspicious. Holding off your vote until the last hours of the Day is scummier than voting earlier, since you hide your intentions of who you'd lynch.

Shidoshi Wrote:You've been calling a lot of attention on to yourself with how much you've posted. I don't take anything from your association with LuvD since he seems to freely associate with whoever is awake when he's posting, but your accusations of me being associated with MasPan are just as weak. You are not really looking too good to me.

Kyrastri Wrote:Is it weird to let people defend themselves, though? I have no reason to believe they are scum until they give me one. I am allowed to be suspicious of what seems scummy, and scummy doesn't always equate to mafia. It could be unintentional behaviour that comes off as scummy to me, since it didn't seem off to you, for example.

Kyrastri Wrote:I originally thought they were for flavour purposes only. Why would people give backstory to a mafia game if not to make it interesting?

Shidoshi Wrote:Kyrastri; "raising the stakes" on someone early makes a lot more sense than doing so later in the Day, that way there's more time for discussion and for votes to be changed if we feel later that there's another person more suspicious. Holding off your vote until the last hours of the Day is scummier than voting earlier, since you hide your intentions of who you'd lynch.
You've been calling a lot of attention on to yourself with how much you've posted. I don't take anything from your association with LuvD since he seems to freely associate with whoever is awake when he's posting, but your accusations of me being associated with MasPan are just as weak. You are not really looking too good to me.

[Vote] Kyrastri

Shidoshi Wrote:MetaSeraphim; might just be faking again, since he seems to like so much to act out roles. I'd be interested to know if, acting or not, they are able to vote. Rhymes, quotes, walls or short lines they are all just talk, intentions are what matters.

MetaSeraphim Wrote:[Vote]Chaz

Kyrastri Wrote:That... makes sense, actually ._. No idea why I didn't consider it earlier. I initially considered later posting (while not completely last minute, 12-ish hours) would raise more impact to the stakes risen, while still capable of calling it off. Though in hindsight, that wouldn't even work since the risen stakes may have reached a majority that would be difficult to remove. Thanks for addressing that.



Call it excitement of playing and having too much free time. I like contributing and discussing, though if that incriminates me I can always slow down my rate of posting if posting a lot bothers you or anyone else. I gotta say, though, saying that me posting too much sounds like a pretty weak basis of accusation. That doesn't invalidate the rest of your post though, so I'll address that.

My calling you being associated with MasPan IS weak; I never claimed it to be the end all of secret organisations, and I think you'd be reassured to know that I'm the paranoid person that thinks EVERYONE is in cahootz with one another. "what if x is in with y and z?" Semi-joking aside, the only reason why I drew the conclusion was because of your posts being next to each other, and the fact that MasPan was unfortunately the first one to agree with you, when I didn't think your proposed plan was a good one.

Feel free to vote for me; even if I'm lynched tonight, I've given my reasoning for suspecting you and you cleared yourself to me (though that doesn't really have much merit if you think I'm suss, so take what you will :p). That and I'll have figured out a little more about my power by midday, so hopefully that information will be of use.

[VOTE] Olsi;

Voting to get more people to talk, since Meow's posted again since I last mentioned her.

EDIT: More role limits? Luv's sounds genuine since his is an actual vote restriction, but who knows.

Kyrastri Wrote:Voting to get more people to talk, since Meow's posted again since I last mentioned her.

EDIT: More role limits? Luv's sounds genuine since his is an actual vote restriction, but who knows.

Polantaris Wrote:Was seriously thinking this. How many roles has Meta played on Day 1, then abandoned by Day 3? I think all the recent games have seen them do that. I know I said earlier not to play based on previous actions but it just seems way too typical of them for me. Certainly not going to vote for Meta off of this, but it is interesting.

Polantaris Wrote:As a heads up:
Chaz and faonkarino have only posted twice.
TheBirds and Olsi have only posted once.
Sega has never posted.

Polantaris Wrote:As for the role limits comment: I believe there is a possibility for any role limits. xBTAx's pre-game commentary along with the massive amounts of flavor as well as the scenario in general leads me to believe this game is power-heavy, or at the very least passive-heavy, and by passive-heavy I mean a lot of non-night action abilities.

Polantaris Wrote:As for the role limits comment: I believe there is a possibility for any role limits. xBTAx's pre-game commentary along with the massive amounts of flavor as well as the scenario in general leads me to believe this game is power-heavy, or at the very least passive-heavy, and by passive-heavy I mean a lot of non-night action abilities.

LuvDWayULie Wrote:MetaSeraphim I dunno what to make of your posts, seriously.

Holypie Wrote:I

MasPan Wrote:Can't

Polantaris Wrote:talk

Polantaris Wrote:only quote other people

MasPan Wrote:He has lied twice before

Polantaris Wrote:meta-game

LuvDWayULie Wrote:is quite annoying

Polantaris Wrote:The main reason I'm currently willing to believe Meta is that I can't imagine anyone willingly playing like that. That has to be a pain in the ass to do.

Polantaris Wrote:That has to be a pain in the ass to do.

Liable Wrote:it

Kyrastri Wrote:IS

Liable Wrote:Jeebus, while I was off studying how this glass ball thingy worked(read: while I was enjoying myself on shade) what on earth with all these walls of texts.

I did have a brief read through it (and will leave the complete analysis until day 1 ends) but at this stage I find it to be rather distracting and is only misleading each other with who to be suspicious of (either intentionally or not).

I don't exactly know the play styles of everyone, so without all the prejudice I am rather suspicious of Chaz;. His passive and reluctant stance on picking someone out feels as if he's not willing to reveal any of his motives and just conform and agree with majority (sounds like something a mafia would do). However if I'm counting correctly he's already got 2 votes under his name.

Faonkarino's vote on him is probably just to get a reaction from him, but Meta's follow-up vote without reason is making me rather reluctant to vote. Though given there's enough time for me to remove my vote and to believe my initial gut feel of him [Vote] Chaz

However as repeated several times, a little more input from the inactives (as mentioned by Polantris) would be nice to get a feel of their stance for this game and pick out the most unhelpful player(whether mafia or not).

LuvDWayULie Wrote:I pray that Sega speaks something. I don't wanna lose a Townie just because he's not talking.

And yeah, I do agree that there are quite a few of passive non-night roles.