+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Main (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Forum: Site Announcements (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Thread: Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team (/showthread.php?tid=23096)
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Corn - 2010-03-02
Rick Wrote:Guys, I'm on IRC almost 24/7... Sometimes I just have to afk, I'm sorry =[
Oh crap you are there right now :f6:. I never noticed you
.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Sarah - 2010-03-02
Takebacker Wrote:That doesn't really make what i said wrong though, since most of the people who are now mods actually are on IRC all the time.
It makes what you said wrong because you implied Eos only chose IRC regulars. He's only been on a couple of times and even then he had VERY little interaction with #southperry, so that couldn't have possibly been his motivation.
imo seems like you're upset that you didn't get picked or nominated. There's nothing wrong with these choices or the fact that they are IRC regulars. Better than picking forum randoms.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Eos - 2010-03-02
Takebacker Wrote:That doesn't really make what i said wrong though, since most of the people who are now mods actually are on IRC all the time.
It does however make the implication you were making, whether intentionally or not, wrong.
@Sarah well there, you got 1 out of 3.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Takebacker - 2010-03-02
Sarah Wrote:It makes what you said wrong because you implied Eos only chose IRC regulars. He's only been on a couple of times and even then he had VERY little interaction with #southperry.
imo seems like you're upset that you didn't get picked or nominated. There's nothing wrong with these choices or the fact that they are IRC regulars. Better than picking forum randoms.
I couldn't have implied that because i don't know how the mod picking process actually works, lol.
I'm not sad/mad/anything over this at all. o.o
Eosian Wrote:It does however make the implication you were making, whether intentionally or not, wrong.
@Sarah well there, you got 1 out of 3.
I didn't imply anything...
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Eos - 2010-03-02
Takebacker Wrote:I couldn't have implied that because i don't know how the mod picking process actually works, lol.
You really shouldn't amend other people's posts if you don't know what they're implying then, should you?
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Beaner - 2010-03-02
i just said that cuz a couple of them i never seen em post where i do, which isnt much since i dont post that much. i was just being my usual ass face person. so dont take my post to heart and stuff. i dont mean they shouldnt be or are bad choices. i am sure they were picked for a reason and as long as they dont warn me for being a beaner its all cool and i shall lick their shoes too.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Takebacker - 2010-03-02
Eosian Wrote:You really shouldn't amend other people's posts if you don't know what they're implying then, should you?
All i did was state an observation. Nothing more. Nothing implied, nothing attacked.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Bomber - 2010-03-02
Congrats narbs.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - y0y0y0y0shi0 - 2010-03-02
That makes me wonder who the other 2 nominees were.
Devil's an IRC regular? Really? Never noticed....
I always see Rick, Ray, XT, and Russt on the IRC.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Eos - 2010-03-02
Takebacker Wrote:All i did was state an observation. Nothing more. Nothing implied, nothing attacked.
No one said it was an attack, but you should be aware enough by now that when you add your two cents reinforcing someone else's statement that has specific connotations or implications that it also implies your own agreement with those implications and shouldn't be surprised when people who disagree with the original implication then try to counter you for having backed it up whether you meant to or not.
We're diverging from the thread topic now, so let's all nod like we understand each other and get back to being nice to the new victims.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Russt - 2010-03-02
Eosian Wrote:victims.
Gee.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Eos - 2010-03-02
Lucida Wrote:Gee.
Handbook. Page .7.
"Moderators are the official scapegoats and whipping boys of all forums. Bend over and pretend to like it."
Incidentally also applies to -Hime-.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - y0y0y0y0shi0 - 2010-03-02
Eosian Wrote:No one said it was an attack, but you should be aware enough by now that when you add your two cents reinforcing someone else's statement that has specific connotations or implications that it also implies your own agreement with those implications and shouldn't be surprised when people who disagree with the original implication then try to counter you for having backed it up whether you meant to or not.Holy run-on sentence is holy.
We're diverging from the thread topic now, so let's all nod like we understand each other and get back to being nice to the new victims.
Lucida Wrote:Gee.Errrr....what I think Eos meant to say was valedictorians! Yeah....that's it.....valedictorians.....
-Shifty Eyes-
@Eos: You must know from experience.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Five Second Pose - 2010-03-02
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:That makes me wonder who the other 2 nominees were.
Devil's an IRC regular? Really? Never noticed....
I always see Rick, Ray, XT, and Russt on the IRC.
He lives in Norway, so time zones, etc. His school acronym is AWESOME.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Russt - 2010-03-02
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:Holy run-on sentence is holy.
-puts on Rick hat-
> No one said it was an attack
> (but) you
-> should be aware enough by now that
--> when you add your two cents reinforcing someone else's statement (that has specific connotations or implications)
--->
-> (and) [you] shouldn't be surprised
--> when people (who disagree with the original implication) then try to counter you (for having backed it up (whether you meant to or not)).
Run-on? I think not.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Eos - 2010-03-02
Lucida Wrote:Run-on? I think not.
Sadly I actually double checked it, ran it through grammar check, and a sentence fragment parser to verify that after he said it. Definitely not a run on, just a very lengthy single thought with multiple qualifiers.
We may have too many English-geeks on the mod team now.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Beaner - 2010-03-02
are there any latinos or blacks in the team? i smell southKKKperry!!
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Eos - 2010-03-02
Dunno, wouldn't it have been racist and potentially discriminatory to have asked everyone's race?
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Corn - 2010-03-02
Beaner Wrote:are there any latinos or blacks in the team? i smell southKKKperry!!
Gays are represented already, so it's not that racist.
Let's hear it for the New Southperry Moderator Team - Eos - 2010-03-02
ClawofBeta Wrote:Gays are represented already, so it's not that racist.
Rainbow mafia. We throw bars of soap through your windows. Be afraid.