![]() |
|
The math help thread - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Rubik's Cube (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Thread: The math help thread (/showthread.php?tid=16948) |
The math help thread - xLeviathan - 2009-11-15 ![]() Halp anyone? ;_; The math help thread - Russt - 2009-11-15 Mean Value Theorem states that there must exist some value c in [4, 8] for which f'© equals the mean value of f'(x) over [4, 8], i.e. the slope from 4 to 8, rise over run: f(8)-f(4) / 8-4. So, for any value of c: -5 ≤ f'© ≤ 3 -5 ≤ f(8)-f(4) / 4 ≤ 3 -20 ≤ f(8)-f(4) ≤ 12 The math help thread - xLeviathan - 2009-11-15 RIGHT. f'© = (f(b) - f(a)) / (b - a) SOOO... -5 < (f(8) - f(4)) / (8 - 4) < 3. Then just multiply both sides by the denominator. As long as I can do that question on the exam, I'm good. ![]() Thanks! ![]() EDIT: FFS the Webwork closed at 10:30. Every online section has ALWAYS closed at 11:30. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFf. The math help thread - Kalovale - 2009-11-16 xLeviathan Wrote:RIGHT. My bad, its more common name is indeed Mean Value Theorem. Darn 3rd world country's math. The math help thread - Russt - 2009-11-16 ^ Lagrange error bound is something else, which has to do with approximating integrals using Simpson's Rule if I recall. The math help thread - Hazzy - 2009-11-16 2^(n^2)-2^n=5 Solve for n algebraically. The math help thread - HooKarez - 2009-11-16 Couldn't you just make the 5 a base of 2? I dunno, but that's the first thing I thought of. 2^x=5 x log 2 = log 5 x = log5 / log2 2^(n^2) - 2^n = 2^(log5/log2) And since the bases are the same.. n^2 - n = log5/log2 and solve? The math help thread - Hazzy - 2009-11-16 I'm under the impression you can't take a log of two terms being added or subtracted and break them up. Tried your way out on my calculator, and came up with n = 1 +- zi, where z is some number I didn't want to copy down. I know this has real solutions, via graphing. The math help thread - HooKarez - 2009-11-16 Yeah. I just graphed both of the equations and they came out different.. <_< Dunno why though. I thought I just substituted 5 with 2^(log5/log2) but I guess not. The math help thread - Hazzy - 2009-11-16 ln ( 5 + 7) != ln 5 + ln 7 :[ I remember my teaching talking about this with some imaginary trig (sin x = 2), using hyperbolic trig functions. Ended up with the same thing, I think, except with base e. Ended up doing a quadratic formula on it, although I can't remember the details.... The math help thread - Noah - 2009-11-16 Hazzy Wrote:2^(n^2)-2^n=5 ![]() Where ![]() Noah The math help thread - Hazzy - 2009-11-16 Putting in the two solutions from that into the equation, I get -2.144 and 14.87. Not really that close to 0. o.0 The math help thread - Noah - 2009-11-16 Hazzy Wrote:Putting in the two solutions from that into the equation, I get -2.144 and 14.87. Not really that close to 0. o.0 Then you have probably misinterpreted. I get 2.10 and -1.10 as results. Keep in mind that ![]() which approximates to 10.29. Noah The math help thread - Hazzy - 2009-11-16 Graphed 2^(n^2)-2^n-5=0 and found the positive zero with the graphing calculator's zero thing. 1.75. o.0 Seems a bit off from 2.10. Are you sure you can take a log of each term on one side like that? ln(5+7)-(ln(5)+ln(7))=-1.07. That doesn't seem equal to me. The math help thread - Russt - 2009-11-16 Yeah, you can't do that. Having said that I don't know what you can do, except factor out a 2^n on the left side which leaves you at a dead end as far as I know. The math help thread - Horusmaster - 2009-11-16 let a=2^n thus the equation a^2-a=5 solve a (do it urself i'm too lazy) then n= log a/ log 2 The math help thread - Russt - 2009-11-16 Horusmaster Wrote:let a=2^nIt's 2^(n^2), not (2^n)^2. Unless it is (2^n)^2, in which case that does work. The math help thread - Noah - 2009-11-16 Hazzy Wrote:Graphed 2^(n^2)-2^n-5=0 and found the positive zero with the graphing calculator's zero thing. 1.75. o.0 This is correct, you cannot apply logarithms like I did. My, my, I seem to go old. Horusmaster Wrote:let a=2^nYou cannot do it that way. If a = 2^n, then 2^(n^2) = a^n. (By the way: Are you 100% sure it's 2^(n^2) and not (2^n)^2? ) [spoiler=Scrabbles, most won't likely help any] ![]() I'll see what I'll be able to do for tomorrow, as it's gettin late over here[/spoiler] Noah The math help thread - Hazzy - 2009-11-16 *facepalm* There's a difference between 2^(n^2) and (2^n)^2? The math help thread - Matt - 2009-11-16 Need some help on this one problem. A winch at the top of a 12 meter building pulls a pipe of the same length to a vertical position, as shown in figure 29. The winch pulls in rope at a rate of -0.2 meters per second. Find the rate of vertical change and the rate of horizontal change at the end of the pipe when y = 6. Here's a picture http://i33.tinypic.com/n2xut2.jpg I got root21/30 for dy/dt and -root7/30 for dx/dt. Is this correct? I didn't feel like using law of cosines, so I dropped two perpendiculars, one to the building and one to the floor. I got that for when y = 6, s = root84 and x is root108. Can anyone confirm for me? I found some answers online that say dy/dt is 1/5 and dx/dt -root3 / 15 |