![]() |
|
Ignore def doesn't stack - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Forum: Game Mechanics (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +--- Thread: Ignore def doesn't stack (/showthread.php?tid=46116) |
Ignore def doesn't stack - SaptaZapta - 2011-08-20 Blades4hire Wrote:Phantom blow is ignoring PDR as it's supposed to. Stereo observed Blast to be ignoring far more def than it should. I saw more ignore def on my hero than should rightfully be there, I don't know whether it's Combat Mastery or something else. That's what I meant. Skills work, but do they work exactly as described? Ignore def doesn't stack - SaptaZapta - 2011-08-20 Kalovale Wrote:Did I mention that the Codex's Ignore %DEF works on normal mobs? It does? I saw no difference in damage with and without it, on Chief Oblivion Guardians. They're normal mobs, right? Ignore def doesn't stack - Kalovale - 2011-08-20 SaptaZapta Wrote:It does? I saw no difference in damage with and without it, on Chief Oblivion Guardians. They're normal mobs, right? I'll reproduce it and take a screencapture, be right back. Edit: Okay, I don't even know anymore. Max range: 12859 clean Max range with no Ignore PDR: 12859 * (1 - 0.1) = 11573 Max range with Ignore PDR 30% (Codex): 12859 * (1 - 0.1*0.7) = 11958 Max range with Ignore PDR 2.5% (Ambition): 12859 * (1 - 0.1*0.975) = 11605 Achieved damage:
Spoiler
Highest I got in a 5-minute-long whacking streak was 1177x, still a good margin from 11958.. It's somewhere a bit more than what Ambition gives, but nowhere close to what Codex gives, let alone both.
Ignore def doesn't stack - Liteness - 2011-08-20 oh while we're on ignore def the description on sacrifice says it doesn't ignore def on bosses, false or true? o.o Ignore def doesn't stack - ShinkuDragon - 2011-08-20 Liteness Wrote:oh while we're on ignore def the description on sacrifice says it doesn't ignore def on bosses, false or true? o.o can't be more false. Ignore def doesn't stack - VerrKol - 2011-08-23 EDIT: @Locked @Blades4hire added more math for clarity... Make sense now? Found a small error in the crusade calculations, but it didn't change the result. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Did my own testing on my BM. Here's my my equips, obviously no PDR on bow. I've got lvl39 ambition (3.5% PDR) ![]() For all testing I used golems (DEF = .25) Assuming only MMS works damage should be: PDR*DEF .2*.25 = .05 DEF-IgnDef .25-05 = .2 Damage after PDR: 1-.2 = .8 Min: .8(17287) = 13829 Max: .8(20338) = 16270 Assuming MMS and Ambition are additive: PDR*DEF (.2+.035)*.25 = .05875 DEF-IgnDef .25-.05875 = .19125 Damage after PDR: 1-.19125 = .80875 Min: .80875(17287) = 13980 Max: .80875(20338) = 16448 Assuming MMS and Ambition (for god alone knows what reason) order sensitive: PDR*DEF .2*25 = .05 .035*(.25-.05) = .007 DEF-IgnDef .2-.007 = .193 Damage after PDR: 1-.193 = .807 Min: .807(172878) = 13950 Max .807(20338) = 16412 After about 5min of attacking i got ![]() So ambition either doesn't stack or is being rounded off to nothing. Which means I can calculate MMS + Crusade set as: PDR*DEF (.2+.15)*.25 = .0875 DEF-IgnDef .25-.0875 = .16625 Damage after PDR: 1-.16625 = .83375 Min: .83375(17287) = 14413 Max: .83375(20338) = 16956 And I got: ![]() So at the very least, the crusade bonus does NOT stack at LHC but MMS does. I'll try normal mobs later today. Ignore def doesn't stack - Locked - 2011-08-23 Your math.. ..it makes no sense. Ignore def doesn't stack - Blades4hire - 2011-08-23 Locked Wrote:Your math.. Ignore def doesn't stack - StopMe - 2011-08-24 Kalovale Wrote:From my own testing, it doesn't seem Ignore Defense 30% works on bosses, at least Dojo bosses. Can someone confirm/deny this? I can confirm this. I have 30% ignore on dagger, 20% from phantom, 30% from leafre set (80% ignore). My damage on PB has not raised one bit since pre chaos. Can't really factor phantom in.. cause, yea... I tried on mano for the dojo situation. No damage increase either. Ignore def doesn't stack - shouri - 2011-08-25 StopMe Wrote:I can confirm this. Did we ever find out if ignore def is multiplicative or additive? I thought it was mutliplicative. e.g. 20% ignore & 20% ignore = 36% ignore total (1-.8*.8) ((or in your case it's 60.8% ignore)) Ignore def doesn't stack - Locked - 2011-08-25 shouri Wrote:Did we ever find out if ignore def is multiplicative or additive? I thought it was mutliplicative. Why would boss damage, total damage and everything potential wise be additive and suddenly the retard named Ignore DEF be multiplicative? Ignore def doesn't stack - IImaplers - 2011-08-25 Maybe I missed something, but I don't understand the outcome so I gotta ask a few questions: 1. Ignore def does not stack on the same weapon (like 15% and 30% being on the same wep wouldn't stack)? 2. Ignore def does not stack on the different weapons (like 15% on a dagger and 30% on a katara wouldn't stack)? 3. What about 15% on a codex to 15% on a weapon, doesn't stack either? Ignore def doesn't stack - ShinkuDragon - 2011-08-25 IImaplers Wrote:Maybe I missed something, but I don't understand the outcome so I gotta ask a few questions: >haven't tested it myself, but suppossedly stack >haven't tested it myself, but suppossedly stack >they would probably stack, however the codex doesn't even give the 15% ignore, so in this example all you have is 15% on your weapon Ignore def doesn't stack - Locked - 2011-08-25 The ONLY thing not working is Codex. Ignore def doesn't stack - Viaje - 2011-08-25 shouri Wrote:Did we ever find out if ignore def is multiplicative or additive? I thought it was mutliplicative.Please stop. Ignore def doesn't stack - Kalovale - 2011-08-25 Viaje Wrote:Please stop. Apples and oranges? Double-layered DEF Ignoring sounds entirely plausible to me. Ignore def doesn't stack - Lyrics - 2011-08-25 ShinkuDragon Wrote:>they would probably stack, however the codex doesn't even give the 15% ignore, so in this example all you have is 15% on your weapon I thought this issue was fixed, :f6:. Ignore def doesn't stack - ShinkuDragon - 2011-08-25 Lyrics Wrote:I thought this issue was fixed, :f6:. nope, it was found out like a week ago Ignore def doesn't stack - Lyrics - 2011-08-25 ShinkuDragon Wrote:nope, it was found out like a week agoAnother thing to add to Nexon's bucket list. Ignore def doesn't stack - CarrionCrow - 2011-08-26 On that note, is it just the 15% ignore options on Codex that's broken, or is the Leafre sets 30% ignore also not working? |