![]() |
|
The revealed potential thread! - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Forum: Scroll Lock (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=34) +--- Thread: The revealed potential thread! (/showthread.php?tid=27973) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
|
The revealed potential thread! - Netto - 2010-09-15 Sn1perJohnE Wrote:I would leave that staff as is, its pretty much as end game as you can get. This. Seriously, I would KILL to have a staff like that. The revealed potential thread! - Flirtini - 2010-09-15 Sn1perJohnE Wrote:I would leave that staff as is, its pretty much as end game as you cani thought total dmg only refers to weapon atk dmg. The revealed potential thread! - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-09-15 Flirtini Wrote:i thought total dmg only refers to weapon atk dmg. That makes no sense, why would it be called total damage then? The revealed potential thread! - 2147483647 - 2010-09-15 Flirtini Wrote:i thought total dmg only refers to weapon atk dmg. Total damage is total, and it stacks with amp. Sn1perJohnE Wrote:I would leave that staff as is, its pretty much as end game as you can get. The problem with my staff is that I cubed my staff 120 times already and when Big Bang comes around, my staff becomes even more obsolete when compared to the Lv.130 wands. Even though my staff is glowing green, it hardly has more magic than a clean Lv.130 wand, gets 3% fewer potential bonus per line, and requires too much unnecessary luk to wear. The only real value attached to my Lv.103 Fire Staff is its sentimental value. I've invested far too much effort and time into this staff to stop cubing at around only a ~15% damage boost. I want 30% bossing damage and and at least %int, %magic, %total damage, or %crit on one of the two secondary lines. The revealed potential thread! - Turtally - 2010-09-15 I'm really interested why your crits were only 110%. When I had 8% crit on my wand, my crits were 200% damage. Only differences I can see are the levels, and wand/staff. The revealed potential thread! - Stereo - 2010-09-15 About the 8% crit being 6% thing... Just took a gander at the data. 4% crits should be 1% * job 8% crits should be 2% * job 3/6/9/12% crits (unique only) are displaying correctly. I didn't know the display strings were separate from the actual percents but apparently so. The revealed potential thread! - Kabanaw - 2010-09-15 2147483647 Wrote:Total damage is total, and it stacks with amp. Time to upgrade to the 163 staff? :o The revealed potential thread! - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-09-15 Kabanaw Wrote:Time to upgrade to the 163 staff? :o Id say this buts hes peaching about too much LUK :c| yer staff is fine Harrison, dont waste any more money on it. The revealed potential thread! - Kabanaw - 2010-09-15 Sn1perJohnE Wrote:Id say this buts hes peaching about too much LUK :c| yer staff is fine Harrison, dont waste any more money on it. Post-BB that 33 extra MA clean from the staff eradicates any bonus luklesses have with 80-100 more int, depending where luk was capped. The revealed potential thread! - 2147483647 - 2010-09-15 @Turtally: My crit is +110%, not 110%. +110% is 210%. @ Stereo: That explains a lot. Good thing I checked it then. The 6% really threw me off in my bossing-time calculations. @Sn1perJohnE: I'm not peaching about having too much luk. I'm saying that my staff is worth less than it should be, because there's no point in getting LUK just to wear a staff that has less magic and less potential bonuses than a lukless wand. The revealed potential thread! - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-09-15 Kabanaw Wrote:Post-BB that 33 extra MA clean from the staff eradicates any bonus luklesses have with 80-100 more int, depending where luk was capped. True, i guess you should just leave yer staff at what it is now Harrison, and start working on getting a 163 staff and work on that when you got it. The staff you have now will last you til then. The revealed potential thread! - 2147483647 - 2010-09-15 I'm not going to bother upgrading, because doing so would take too much time, especially now that it's extremely difficult to make money from in game. The revealed potential thread! - Turtally - 2010-09-15 2147483647 Wrote:@Turtally: My crit is +110%, not 110%. +110% is 210%. Oh. Well I'm silly. The revealed potential thread! - 2147483647 - 2010-09-16 Okay I went back and looked. Turtally Wrote:Hence the "not sure if want". My goal was to get % int or % magic. I wasn't even sure if % damage worked on mages... :/ In hindsight, I probably should have kept it. Your crit is definitely +110% damage, not +100% (or 200%) as you stated earlier. I guess the +110% damage is universal. The revealed potential thread! - Turtally - 2010-09-16 2147483647 Wrote:Okay I went back and looked. Yeah I wasn't really testing it enough to find that extra 10%. Now I'm wondering if this will be changed when BB comes around. The revealed potential thread! - Nalek - 2010-09-19 ![]() Pretty good for a random drop o_o The revealed potential thread! - ¬Rob - 2010-09-19 <3 Cubes. ![]() ![]() Earrings shall stay till I get everything else to epic/6% luk, then going for unique. :3 @30%LUK now.<3 The revealed potential thread! - Kaasoljoyyx - 2010-09-19 ![]() c The revealed potential thread! - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-09-19 Kaasoljoyyx Wrote: a-@ I didnt know you SPed Nao D: The revealed potential thread! - Twilight - 2010-09-19 ![]() Explain. |