JezzaRules Wrote:Most likely they'd be in hospital by the time I'm done with them, given that they attack first or if one of the men is Chuck Norris.

Quantact Wrote:You're being an "internet tough guy" here. I can be one too, I can claim that I can open your skull and spill your brains out on the sidewalk, etc. etc.

I was in two fraternities which numbered more than 100 men between them, I know the score, I know what men think about guys like you. You smack a woman in a bar, 2 bikers each the size of a large cabinet will put his fist in your teeth. Out in the street it might be a small Korean guy that's a 7th degree black belt in TKD.

Then after all THAT the cops come. Boy, you should try sending THEM in the hospital, they just love that.

Stop being an internet tough guy. It's dumb and nobody gives a $hit.

Quantact Wrote:You're being an "internet tough guy" here. I can be one too, I can claim that I can open your skull and spill your brains out on the sidewalk, etc. etc.

I was in two fraternities which numbered more than 100 men between them, I know the score, I know what men think about guys like you. You smack a woman in a bar, 2 bikers each the size of a large cabinet will put their fists in your teeth. Out in the street it might be a small Korean guy that's a 7th degree black belt in TKD.

Then after all THAT the cops come. Boy, you should try sending THEM in the hospital, they just love that.

Stop being an internet tough guy. It's dumb and nobody gives a $hit.

XBish Wrote:right back at ya. no need to be self righteous, no one knows what will happen, and most of us have said we would rather not hit a girl, and i think most of us have not. however there are times when it does come to mind and getting an incurable diseasse is one of them. women want equality, same rights and all that crap, how come some people go middle ages at times and say they weak and what not. like i said before i know girls that scare me to no end they would probably kill you for the same reason and everyone would say that guy was a pig well done. pulling a lorena bobbit makes a woman a hero, slaping a ho once makes a man a beater and he goes to jail.

double standards suck, equality my ass, women are not weak and powerless, thats just macho talk.

Opeth Wrote:ITT: Bawww and internet White Knights.

If some crazy bit'ch came after you with a knife, are you "men" gonna stand there and let her gut you like a freshly caught Koi? (dohoho) No, you're gonna slap a ho, and kick her into the ground until she's no longer a threat.

Now that I've already imploded the thread, yes, if Rihanna did give this Chris guy herpes, she deserved whatever came to her. I don't give a flying f'uck what's "immoral" or not. If some chick willingly gave me herpes you're damn right I'd be socking her in the face.

Equality, baby.

Quantact Wrote:The bolded sentence is the epitome of what is wrong with women's lib. Women are almost always physically weaker than men. For a man to beat up a woman is almost always a case of a STRONG person OVERWHELMING a WEAK person. Sinnuendo, do you know what "cowardice" is? What I am talking about is here pretty much the definition of "cowardice." Just because it's socially unacceptable doesn't mean it's wrong. Actually, traditions that have survived 3,000 years may be there for a REASON.

Sinnuendo Wrote:Chivalry is dead, good sir.

Quantact Wrote:First, "internet tough guy" is somebody who's probably a platypus in real life that acts tough on the internet. Instead of providing debatable content, he tells the guy he's talking to that he can cave in his skull, that he'll find where he lives and shoot him, etc. If you're going to call me an internet tough guy, please point out where I said any of that.

Second, Carlos, you did not read the whole thread. I said the same thing you're saying. I provided an example I knew of where some woman went around deliberately infecting men with AIDS, and another one that destroyed my family's life over an extended period of time. I believe that in cases such as these physical violence is justified. It is right here:

http://www.southperry.net/forums/showthread.php?p=148570#post148570

Women are societally conditioned to refrain from violence because it's "unladylike." A man whom you piss off very badly will attack you physically but most women you do that to will try to get revenge that will screw with your emotions or with your mind. The average catfight between two chicks is backstabbing and revenge, but they don't physically assault each other as often as men. If you piss a typical girl bad enough, she will slap you. If a girl feels physically threatened from a guy, she will use something like mace, because the vast majority of the time a woman cannot physically defend herself from a male assailant, and that's the whole point here. MOST women are weaker than MOST men. And the chicks that are 4th degree blackbelts in judo or are militant lesbians are not "average women." I honestly don't think any of this should be in dispute. It's not a debatable point, it's a simple observation of human development.

The vast majority of incidents of man to woman violence are some 4'11" girly girl that can't lift 40 pounds with both arms, that slaps a guy after he crudely propositions her for sex or tells her to flash him her tits. A weak girl slapping you in the face is not going to give you AIDS or herpes. Literally all my female friends are afraid of walking alone at night, that's not because of other chicks. You can't approach a physically helpless girl, piss her off beyond belief, and then beat the pomegranate out of her after she slaps you. If that's the meaning of liberalism nowadays, then it's a failure and a disgrace.

Quantact Wrote:First, "internet tough guy" is somebody who's probably a platypus in real life that acts tough on the internet. Instead of providing debatable content, he tells the guy he's talking to that he can cave in his skull, that he'll find where he lives and shoot him, etc. If you're going to call me an internet tough guy, please point out where I said any of that.

Second, Carlos, you did not read the whole thread. I said the same thing you're saying. I provided an example I knew of where some woman went around deliberately infecting men with AIDS, and another one that destroyed my family's life over an extended period of time. I believe that in cases such as these physical violence is justified. It is right here:

http://www.southperry.net/forums/showthread.php?p=148570#post148570

Women are societally conditioned to refrain from violence because it's "unladylike." A man whom you piss off very badly will attack you physically but most women you do that to will try to get revenge that will screw with your emotions or with your mind. The average catfight between two chicks is backstabbing and revenge, but they don't physically assault each other as often as men. If you piss a typical girl bad enough, she will slap you. If a girl feels physically threatened from a guy, she will use something like mace, because the vast majority of the time a woman cannot physically defend herself from a male assailant, and that's the whole point here. MOST women are weaker than MOST men. And the chicks that are 4th degree blackbelts in judo or are militant lesbians are not "average women." I honestly don't think any of this should be in dispute. It's not a debatable point, it's a simple observation of human development.

The vast majority of incidents of man to woman violence are some 4'11" girly girl that can't lift 40 pounds with both arms, that slaps a guy after he crudely propositions her for sex or tells her to flash him her tits. A weak girl slapping you in the face is not going to give you AIDS or herpes. Literally all my female friends are afraid of walking alone at night, that's not because of other chicks. You can't approach a physically helpless girl, piss her off beyond belief, and then beat the pomegranate out of her after she slaps you. If that's the meaning of liberalism nowadays, then it's a failure and a disgrace.