![]() |
|
Obscenity - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Main (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Forum: Site Announcements (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Thread: Obscenity (/showthread.php?tid=63089) |
Obscenity - LegendGospel - 2013-03-11 That's just why I hate working with Google. Am I allowed to say moralfags? Fruit version will do. Obscenity - ResistGreen - 2013-03-11 Rob Wrote:AHha, seriously, for that thread? I bet it didn't cover the JoeTang god of lolis thread. You'd be surprised, 90% of them still exist. Obscenity - JoeTang - 2013-03-11 Rob Wrote:AHha, seriously, for that thread? I bet it didn't cover the JoeTang god of lolis thread. Great memories, thank you. Obscenity - Pikamemnon - 2013-03-11 Hope the appeal goes smoothly, seems kinda weird that the Google robots or w/e picked up on something from so long ago that no one cares about. Obscenity - GraveJokerR - 2013-03-11 Ouch, sorry to hear about that. Obscenity - Five Second Pose - 2013-03-11 Chew Wrote:The number of threads I can "see" (but not access) is related to "me" the user or to everyone? Only mods, admins, and the person who started the appeal thread can actually see them. Obscenity - FelixTM - 2013-03-11 lol I love my life right now. IT'S LIKE THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT. BUT WITH GOOGLE. And karma, or something. Obscenity - Kunagisa - 2013-03-11 ![]() Google has it cached if anyone is interested. Obscenity - Polantaris - 2013-03-11 Pikamemnon Wrote:Hope the appeal goes smoothly, seems kinda weird that the Google robots or w/e picked up on something from so long ago that no one cares about. It's possible that someone, maybe even someone with no relation to SP, searched for such content, found the thread, and the search engine having found the thread threw out the warning for it. I of course have no idea if that's how it works, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was similar to that scenario. Obscenity - street - 2013-03-11 How much does sp get from ad sense.? Obscenity - Eos - 2013-03-12 street Wrote:How much does sp get from ad sense.? Pretty much our entire operating budget, particularly the portion that pays for extractions. You're not going to get specific numbers. Obscenity - G-Meister - 2013-03-12 Obscenity - Rob - 2013-03-12 JoeTang Wrote:Great memories, thank you. Don't even get me started ![]() FelixTM Wrote:lol I love my life right now. And just that one thread. Imagine all the things buried from 4 years ago! Kunagisa Wrote: Interesting. There's a lot of stuff worth bringing up just to pineapple with everyone's memories. Obscenity - iamflip - 2013-03-12 Eos Wrote:Pretty much our entire operating budget, particularly the portion that pays for extractions. You're not going to get specific numbers. Ouch. :c That said, is there a back-up plan for the funds to continue along? Obscenity - Eos - 2013-03-12 iamflip Wrote:Ouch. :c Pick another ad provider at random, rewrite the ad interface to support them, and hope they pay as well or better. As uncertain as all that is, not worth trying before the 72 appeal window is up. Obscenity - MetaSeraphim - 2013-03-12 Rob Wrote:And just that one thread. Imagine all the things buried from 4 years ago! Oh, don't you know the half it! I remember a bunch of threads from the old days that if posted today would get Rob Wrote:Interesting. There's a lot of stuff worth bringing up just to pineapple with everyone's memories. It would have to be content safe though I believe. The obscenity rule applies to even if you're quoting something so it should apply to if you post a link to the thread? Obscenity - IllegallySane - 2013-03-12 Well. looks like I better try to scrub though some of my old posts then........ On the flip side, this is why we can't have nice things and post bikini girls with impunity. Sorry to hear some past actions have somehow come back to bite the site in the metaphorical ass. Obscenity - Killed - 2013-03-12 looooooooooool. Obscenity - CuteBDeadly - 2013-03-13 Daakun Wrote:Jeeze that's silly. IKR I saw that ad too, and thought that was VERY provocative. Maybe Eos could dig up a copy of that ad, and send it their way to show the blatant double standard? Obscenity - ShinkuDragon - 2013-03-13 CuteBDeadly Wrote:IKR I saw that ad too, and thought that was VERY provocative. Maybe Eos could dig up a copy of that ad, and send it their way to show the blatant double standard? i have the ad saved on my photobucket, i'd post it but i honestly don't know if that would be breaking the obscenity rule -_- |