Southperry.net
Content Aware testing - Printable Version

+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+--- Thread: Content Aware testing (/showthread.php?tid=25542)

Pages: 1 2 3


Content Aware testing - whybanme - 2010-05-10

[Image: dscf0005z.jpg]

to

[Image: dscf0005noleaf.jpg]
and
[Image: dscf0005nospider.jpg]


Content Aware testing - Jon - 2010-05-10

whybanme Wrote:-snip-

Wow, that leafjob was actually quite decent.


Content Aware testing - ★★★★★ - 2010-05-10

imjon Wrote:Wow, that leafjob was actually quite decent.

I know right? i was surprised


Content Aware testing - Jon - 2010-05-10

★★★★★ Wrote:I know right? i was surprised

I find it odd that it can find the huge line behind the leaf, but it can't complete the spider's web where its leg was. e_e


Content Aware testing - Russt - 2010-05-10

It's two intersecting lines in that area. Makes it somewhat tougher.


Content Aware testing - Jon - 2010-05-10

Lucida Wrote:It's two intersecting lines in that area. Makes it somewhat tougher.

BUT IT'S MAGIC.
c


Content Aware testing - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-05-11

Start
 Spoiler

Finish
 Spoiler

Even though it uses sampled areas of the image, it does a dam good job determining what goes where.


Content Aware testing - Yotsuba - 2010-05-11

[imgspoiler]http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/5337/1260509016558.jpg[/imgspoiler]

Scary eyes!!!

[imgspoiler]http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/7232/eyeless.jpg[/imgspoiler]

Ah, okay, that's better...

[imgspoiler]http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/4906/faceless.jpg[/imgspoiler]

AH, SCARY AGAIN!

[imgspoiler]http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6136/faceless2.png[/imgspoiler]

Meh, messing around a bit after.


Content Aware testing - Jon - 2010-05-11

Sn1perJohnE Wrote:Start
 Spoiler

Finish
 Spoiler

Even though it uses sampled areas of the image, it does a dam good job determining what goes where.

That's rather creepy, tbh. o___________o I'ma try that. I'll edit in here.

EDIT:
Well, I didn't quite do anything like that, but I messed around some more:

Mr. Nosey Moustache
 Before
 After

Expressionless
 Before
 After



Content Aware testing - Yotsuba - 2010-05-11

Oh right, said I'd give this a try.

[imgspoiler]http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/5593/10315183.jpg[/imgspoiler]

[imgspoiler]http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/5834/sayaedit2.jpg[/imgspoiler]

SPARKLES AND HEARTS EVERYWHERE!

[imgspoiler]http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/8730/sayaedit1.jpg[/imgspoiler]

Surprisingly works well when I add "subtract". I like the subtle glow going on there, didn't add any of that at all.


Content Aware testing - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-05-11

imjon Wrote:That's rather creepy, tbh. o___________o I'ma try that. I'll edit in here.

You saying im creepy? Frown


Content Aware testing - Yotsuba - 2010-05-11

Sn1perJohnE Wrote:You saying im creepy? Frown

No, the "ghost vapor cum" mark from where you used to be is. Filled the space nicely in a lot of parts though.


Content Aware testing - Jon - 2010-05-11

Yotsuba Wrote:Surprisingly works well when I add "subtract". I like the subtle glow going on there, didn't add any of that at all.

ohai HQ version.

what is this "subtract" you speak of? o_o


Content Aware testing - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-05-11

People fight
 Spoiler

Racket fight
 Spoiler



Content Aware testing - Jon - 2010-05-11

Sn1perJohnE Wrote:People fight
 Spoiler

Racket fight
 Spoiler

F'UCK YEAH!
That's actually really awesome, haha. You have very nice content aware-able images. ;_;


Content Aware testing - Hazzy - 2010-05-11

Sn1perJohnE Wrote:People fight
 Spoiler

Racket fight
 Spoiler

You can see little blurs where they were.... like those invisible things in Super Smash Bros / Melee / Brawl.


Content Aware testing - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-05-11

Hazzy Wrote:You can see little blurs where they were.... like those invisible things in Super Smash Bros / Melee / Brawl.

It mainly happens because of how it recreates the parts being edited out. Since its a bit of a gradient light, it wont be able to get it 100%. Still pretty close though, and for the time, it is super fast compared to how people would do it manually.