+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Arts & Entertainment (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Forum: General Entertainment (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=71)
+---- Forum: Pokemon (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=72)
+---- Thread: Pokémon X and Pokémon Y (/showthread.php?tid=60273)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - 案山子 - 2013-03-10
Jon Wrote:Wow, those are really interesting fakes.
I've always liked the ones here: http://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=197142
Best fakes I've ever seen. Most of them look legit.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Maping - 2013-03-10
Jon Wrote:Wow, those are really interesting fakes.
I agree, but you can definitely tell they're fake. Kake'mons always have a distinct style real ones don't.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Punch - 2013-03-10
Razmos Wrote:[video=youtube_share;C02yV1S3Yxo]http://youtu.be/C02yV1S3Yxo[/video]
obviously all fake, but I thought some of these had some really good designs, like the Electric hummingbird and the Ghost/Bug pumpkin pokemon. Bug/Dragon Dragonfly, a scarecrow pokemon.
Also some 5th gen babies and evolutions towards the end.
Here's a picture if the video is too long
Haha I only just noticed the Stunfisk evolution, top notch.
Man, Surfhin and Tidude are my favorites of all those. I seriously want one. Cute/Cool.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Malthe - 2013-03-11
I wonder if we'll get a non-legendary pure flying this gen ):
Also, a pokémon that needs a good evolution, IMO:
Spoiler
![[Image: 351.png]](http://pokemon.supercheats.com/artwork/351.png)
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Kirov - 2013-03-11
There are lots of useless Pokémon that need a good evolution. I would rather they focused on that than adding a bunch of new ones.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Malthe - 2013-03-11
pokémon that IMO could need evolution:
Pinsir
Kangaskhan
Mr. mime
Jynx
Shuckle
Heracross
Vigoroth (One that doesn't end with a pokémon with truant..)
Mawile
Sableye
Relicanth
Luvdisc
Carnivine
Sableye
Mawile
Torkoal
And no, these aren't pokémon that i want to become stronger or something, i just want some cool evolutions for them
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Razmos - 2013-03-11
I'm still hoping for a Drifblim evolution. It's stats suck, and it could easily become a huge blimp pokemon and become the biggest ghost type. Acting as sort of a flying "ferry to the underworld" to go with it's previous pokedex entries.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Maping - 2013-03-11
Razmos Wrote:I'm still hoping for a Drifblim evolution. It's stats suck, and it could easily become a huge blimp pokemon and become the biggest ghost type. Acting as sort of a flying "ferry to the underworld" to go with it's previous pokedex entries.
If they put a miniature Charon on that, Nintendo would win at life.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Razmos - 2013-03-12
They really need to start releasing more information.
I found this video. Just a guy talking about what he wants from Gen 6 and looking at fake scans and stuff. But seriously, it's hilarious some of misjudgements he makes, like thinking a character from LoZ: Wind Waker is a Froakie evolution. and then connects it to Naruto, because Naruto and Bleach are seemingly the only Japanese things he knows.
[video=youtube_share;HJ16nSY0psI]http://youtu.be/HJ16nSY0psI[/video]
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - ShinkuDragon - 2013-03-12
Malthe Wrote:pokémon that IMO could need evolution:
Pinsir
Kangaskhan
Mr. mime
Jynx
Shuckle
Heracross
Vigoroth (One that doesn't end with a pokémon with truant..)
Mawile
Sableye
Relicanth
Luvdisc
Carnivine
Sableye
Mawile
Torkoal
And no, these aren't pokémon that i want to become stronger or something, i just want some cool evolutions for them
weren't vigoroth's stats comparable to regular final evolutions?
also kangashkan needs a prevolution before an evolution, like seriously, it's had the baby in it's pouch since freaking gen 1! make it canon nintendo, geez!
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Razmos - 2013-03-12
![[Image: 1266900666065.jpg]](http://www.infendo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/1266900666065.jpg)
My mind is blown.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - MasPan - 2013-03-12
Razmos Wrote:[COLOR="#cc8899"]
My mind is blown.
That...makes a surprising amount of sense, excepting the names (Butterfree is clearly a butterfly, Venomoth is clearly a moth).[/COLOR]
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Razmos - 2013-03-12
Yeah, the names and their types are the only things that set them apart. I wonder why they ended up doing it this way?
It wouldn't have been THAT silly for Venonat to evolve into Butterfree. Remoraid evolves into Octillery after all. (though I suppose it evolves from a gun into a cannon, but that's not the point)
Same with the Cubone/Marowak/Kangaskhan/Missingno thing. As much as I love Generation 1, it seems horribly outdated and nonsensical now that the idea of split evolutions and gender differences exist (Nidoran). It's too late for them to really revamp the Gen 1 pokemon though without alienating those of us that grew up on them.
does anybody else think that Gen 1 should be revamped?
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - KhainiWest - 2013-03-12
Razmos Wrote:Yeah, the names and their types are the only things that set them apart. I wonder why they ended up doing it this way?
It wouldn't have been THAT silly for Venonat to evolve into Butterfree. Remoraid evolves into Octillery after all. (though I suppose it evolves from a gun into a cannon, but that's not the point)
Same with the Cubone/Marowak/Kangaskhan/Missingno thing. As much as I love Generation 1, it seems horribly outdated and nonsensical now that the idea of split evolutions and gender differences exist (Nidoran). It's too late for them to really revamp the Gen 1 pokemon though without alienating those of us that grew up on them.
does anybody else think that Gen 1 should be revamped?
You should youtube "Pokemon myths". Mew=ditto, haunter licking misty=death to misty, which is why she left the show, uh, voltorb self destructs and becomes haunter, when cloyster dies he becomes ghastly, clefable is the light version of gengar, those are some off the top of my head.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - ShinkuDragon - 2013-03-12
KhainiWest Wrote:You should youtube "Pokemon myths". Mew=ditto, haunter licking misty=death to misty, which is why she left the show, uh, voltorb self destructs and becomes haunter, when cloyster dies he becomes ghastly, clefable is the light version of gengar, those are some off the top of my head.
afaik mew is just the "original creation" of arceus and is able to learn all techniques because of that. but i'm quite foggy on poke-lore currently.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - KhainiWest - 2013-03-12
ShinkuDragon Wrote:afaik mew is just the "original creation" of arceus and is able to learn all techniques because of that. but i'm quite foggy on poke-lore currently.
I was being sloppy but essentially Ditto is the failed duplication of mew. They are essentially the same color, they are the same weight, they are the only two pokemon in the universe to learn transform, and in the original series ditto were only found in cinnibar island, where mewtwo was created.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - ShinkuDragon - 2013-03-12
Razmos Wrote:Yeah, the names and their types are the only things that set them apart. I wonder why they ended up doing it this way?
It wouldn't have been THAT silly for Venonat to evolve into Butterfree. Remoraid evolves into Octillery after all. (though I suppose it evolves from a gun into a cannon, but that's not the point)
Same with the Cubone/Marowak/Kangaskhan/Missingno thing. As much as I love Generation 1, it seems horribly outdated and nonsensical now that the idea of split evolutions and gender differences exist (Nidoran). It's too late for them to really revamp the Gen 1 pokemon though without alienating those of us that grew up on them.
does anybody else think that Gen 1 should be revamped?
nah, what happened happened, besides nidoran is the same as the newer sex-driven evolutions, the only difference is that it takes double the space in the pokedex.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Malthe - 2013-03-12
ShinkuDragon Wrote:weren't vigoroth's stats comparable to regular final evolutions?
Vigoroth has 440 total base stats, it's pretty low.
Slaking on the other hand is an absolute monster... but truant prevents it from being good
I'd just like a sloth pokémon that didn't have the ability truant.
I love sloths.
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Razmos - 2013-03-12
Isn't the strategy regarding Slaking to use a pokemon that has Simple Beam, Mummy or Skill Swap to change it's ability?
Pokémon X and Pokémon Y - Malthe - 2013-03-12
Most typical strategy is hit and run, use an attack and then switch it out.
I find that so damn boring.
Also neither worry seed nor simple beam work on pokémon with truant.
Not to mention that having to switch out after each attack makes you damn prone to any kind of entry hazards