dowie Wrote:so now that the sword comes from marvel, nexon has no means to fix the glitch :3

Marksman Bryan Wrote:Would appease every single player, and make a good name for MLC

Marksman Bryan Wrote:I was working on a f'ucking awesome proposal before I was forcefully removed left MLC. Honestly surprised it hasn't been implemented yet. Would appease every single player, and make a good name for MLC. Then again, it was my idea, so it's probably scrapped.

ShinkuDragon Wrote:i'm sorry if i'm REALLY skeptic, but the hole nexon has to fill is larger than the great canyon, so that's a very bold statement.

SaptaZapta Wrote:Tall claim, considering anything that would make one player happy is likely to make another mad, or at least indifferent (and consequently mad about "this is what you've been wasting your time on, instead of <whatever I care about>?"). Not to mention that things which make players happy tend to make Nexon sad, and vice versa.
Except, I suppose, bug fixes. I don't know why anyone would object to the CC DC going away, for example. But the MLC doesn't deal with bugs, does it?

Anyway, not trying to make you say more. Hopefully if it's that great, some other councilor picked it up and ran with it to goal.

SaptaZapta Wrote:Back on topic.
Zelkova, considering the NDA you all are under, is there any meaningful response you can give to these tickets?
Other than, "I see what you mean, and I'll bring this up for discussion"?
You can't say, "This has already been discussed" or "something is in the works for that" or even "we tried this but it was rejected." So what can you say?

Also, is there a way to see all previous topics?

SaptaZapta Wrote:Back on topic.
Zelkova, considering the NDA you all are under, is there any meaningful response you can give to these tickets?
Other than, "I see what you mean, and I'll bring this up for discussion"?
You can't say, "This has already been discussed" or "something is in the works for that" or even "we tried this but it was rejected." So what can you say?

Also, is there a way to see all previous topics?

Grey Wrote:Sapta, you've submitted a few tickets, no? Might I ask how your experience with the site and their responses has been so far?

SaptaZapta Wrote:As for the site itself, it's obviously still not quite there. Logs you out and back in at random, broken links, random shape-shifting, etc. And of course no idea of its security, so don't use any credentials you use anywhere else (but that's always good practice). But the basic functionality of writing a message and getting a response to it (by email) seems to be working.

SaptaZapta Wrote:Zelkova, when I said "all previous tickets" I didn't mean their details. Just the title would do, for starters. The "recent topics" list only shows 5.

SaptaZapta Wrote:I submitted two tickets, and both got the same sort of response I described above: "I agree, and I'll bring this up in discussion."
The more interesting thing is that one of the tickets was about allowing more chair bags to be used. A little while back, the MLC ran a survey regarding the choked inventory issue in general. I would hope that survey led to some kind of discussion, and possibly a resolution (although I may be too optimistic regarding the time-frame of MLC discussions). And yet I did not get an answer hinting that some other solution to the inventory issue was in the works, or any indication that the councilor even heard of the issue before.
This is kind of what prompted my question.

As for the site itself, it's obviously still not quite there. Logs you out and back in at random, broken links, random shape-shifting, etc. And of course no idea of its security, so don't use any credentials you use anywhere else (but that's always good practice). But the basic functionality of writing a message and getting a response to it (by email) seems to be working.

Zelkova Wrote:If the topic has been up for discussion we have been given the green light to acknowledge that it has been talked about. We cannot however state where it is within the system or if it has been approved or not yet. It's all very limiting.

Most of the responses should be mild or bland for now as we haven't had a meeting yet.

Give us a couple of days if you can. I'll see if we can update tickets with correspondence from the MLC about what we thought about each ticket during the meetings. (another grey area)

fodjgngf Wrote:You guys seem to forget that CRA gear was locked behind a paywall for a long long time. Having them add Ryudes to marvel is nothing I'm surprised about.

Zelkova Wrote:CRA gear was not locked behind the paywall, it was made available via Root Abyss and some form of in-game gachapon (like the nuts or philosopher books).

Grey Wrote:That's not true. Despite the fact that Chaos Root Abyss was released at the same time it was in KMS, January 2013, the bosses were unkillable for quite a while, as far as I know, until after RED, except for a few queen kills right before RED. And as I remember, they didn't even start dropping equips until later still. Meanwhile, they were rewards for stuff like philosopher books which are still part of the paywall. They were pretty much effectively locked behind a paywall.

Hell, the same thing happened with Empress weapons before this, except, in hindsight, it was pretty ambiguous whether or not Empress could've been killed, whether they eventually limited her heals, or if she could always have been killed by making her heal 35~40 times, as I recall. My first Empress axe came not from Empress, but someone who got it from Crystal Scales or Music Boxes, or whatever it was at the time. I distinctly remember because we tried killing Empress and got her to 20 heals afterwards in an attempt to be the first group to kill Empress.