+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+--- Forum: Training Center (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Magician (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=39)
+---- Thread: Proof of the 163 Ele wands!!*SS* (/showthread.php?tid=7292)
Pages:
1
2
Proof of the 163 Ele wands!!*SS* - Eos - 2009-01-16
Silver_ice Wrote:wow. so that requires 165 luk if im not mistaken. ur base is 90 so u have an added 75 luk?
holy jesus.... thats like.. 22 ht pend, 15 helm, probly 3 shoes. 5 glove. and maybe a 30 overall? u got some serious luk gear.
and yea i know those wands exist. they are sexy but for me achieving 165 luk outta 88 base seems really tough.
I remembered wrong, I have 105 luck, +48 from equip, +12 from MW 20. (165 on the dot).
My gear is predominantly int gear, I just happen to have picked int gear that comes with loads of luck naturally. ( Ciaras, Varrs, Bazura). Throw on the helm int + chaos scrolled zhelm (
) and the HT pendant with egg. and voila.
Proof of the 163 Ele wands!!*SS* - Kabanaw - 2009-01-16
DarthIsis1 Wrote:Ya Jake, pomegranate staff unless you pineappleed up your stats and are that poor to reset.
Or that chose to cap their luk that high :^l
I'm hoping to be able to not have to resort to MW to equip my staff. I'd rather be able to wear it without anything extra. But, with a timeless shield, timeless overall, timeless shoes, zhelm and ht pendant + egg I should be able to wear it no problem. (I'm assuming by the time I get to 163 the Time Temple will have come out.)
Proof of the 163 Ele wands!!*SS* - TamilTiger1 - 2009-01-28
I've seen one in bera for like 300-500mil somewhere. But I don't have any mesos in that server
couldn't get it. I want a level 163 ice staff in scania plox (only know of one that came out long long time ago).
Proof of the 163 Ele wands!!*SS* - Tommie=) - 2009-01-31
but ice-berg shuld be much better if u play pure int rye?
Proof of the 163 Ele wands!!*SS* - Kirov - 2009-01-31
Tommie=) Wrote:but ice-berg shuld be much better if u play pure int rye?
Well it would be hard to make the 165 luk requirement if you were lukless anyway. But Elemental Wand 7/Iceberg wand is better than the staff (even if you aren't lukless) since it needs (a lot of) luk and the wand doesn't.