LuvDWayULie Wrote:Oh great, like the last game again. These two seriously..

Kyrastri Wrote:They also have not responded to my vote on page 8 to defend themselves.

TheBirds Wrote:how about the fact that you and luv seem far too buddy buddy and seemingly go after the same person? what is the deal with that anyway?

TheBirds Wrote:what, you find my playstyle annoying? well excuse me for having a different playstyle. i find you to be really annoying but you don't see me running around saying it except for this one time.

TheBirds Wrote:well excuse me sweetheart for not being as active and almighty as you. you want scumhunting? how about the fact that you and luv seem far too buddy buddy and seemingly go after the same person? what is the deal with that anyway?

Liable Wrote:Really? Luv just seems to be floating around not really providing much input. He doesn't seem to have a specific target or anything. While Kyrastri on the other hand focuses her target one by one. True they seem rather close but that's probably something outside of the game (and seemed to have developed over the last game).

Anyway hmm... not many actions since I last posted and I'm about to go sleep so... If I'm counting correctly at the moment we have:

Chaz: 3 votes
Liable (me): 2 votes
Meta, MasPan, TheBirds, Sega: 1 vote each.

I kindah feel guilty for shaking up Chaz and his most recent post makes me want to give him a chance. While there are a few whom I think aren't really motivated with trying to look for the mafia, I feel that Sega; 's negative attitude is something that stands out and believe it won't be a profit to remain in the game (even if he were to be a townie).

[Vote]Sega

Kyrastri Wrote:It's not so much that your playstyle is 'annoying' but I don't see what you're getting at by being silent here unless you're trying to pull off what you did last game, (which was so pineappleing good just saying, holy pomegranate...) which isn't good for town, and implicates you badly. Retaliating with insults doesn't add much to your case, either.



Never claimed to be 'almighty'. Now that's just petty. And if activity is really an issue, you should be letting other people know in the discussion thread. Not letting anyone know of a potentially busy schedule (and I do admit, the thread did blow up a little so it does seem worse than it probably is) then complaining that we're too active is a fault on your behalf, not mine.

It's been pointed out time and time again that Luv 'associates' and agrees with people who are currently posting. It's not like I can control what he agrees with and doesn't agree with. Nobody took notice when I first voted for you, either so it's not like he's been with me since the start.

You might also want to look at other people who agreed when I pointed you out today, rather than rage at Luv and I.

Holypie Wrote:Okay just checking in for probably the last time today. I might be able to get back a little bit before the day ends but there's no guarantees. Also doing anything so last minute looks ridiculously scummy either way.

I'm hesitant to remove my vote on Chaz, he's explained his reasoning for his passive yes-man style but it still feels like he's trying to get out of the spotlight with as little effort as possible.

On the other hand there's Sega who's checked in after so long to basically say that he can do whatever the hell he wants. In a collaborative game like this, it really goes without saying that that kind of attitude is pretty anti town. Even so, at the moment I don't really feel like he's scum.

As for TheBirds? I can't make heads or tails of what's going on there.

Niernen Wrote:So, just my thoughts on Kyrastri;'s power. We don't know much at all, what we do know is:

1. It is a day time skill
2. Announced to everyone
3. Based on a dice roll.
4. Must target another player (can target self, but advised not to).

From that, it seems to be a transfer affect if it needs to target another. If the "overpowering" does give him meowmixx;'s vote, he does not get a double vote, but instead gets someone else's. If this is true, it is also possible he can borrow powers too. There is still a lot we don't now about it though. Is the effect permanent, day only, or day and night? Does he have to use the power (it it required to be used everyday?). It seems to be pretty powerful, he could target someone he is suspicious of and possibly take their vote or power. But because it is announced, it makes him a large target to the mafia. If they feel his skill is dangerous to them they would probably target him before he can use is power on one of them.

Also, people need to remember there are possibly neutral roles. People like Sega; and TheBirds; that are staying silent may not be either town or mafia, and have their own win condition they are waiting for. It's just a though.

I'll don't want to vote right now because people might have some other ideas, but if it is coming close to the end of the day I would probably vote for Sega too as he does not seem to be helping or care about the town.

Kyrastri Wrote:but I don't see what you're getting at by being silent here

Kyrastri Wrote:While you're bringing up the topic of more roles, would you imagine mafia having abilities (restricted to night, maybe) would be a huge possibility, or would it be too OP?

Unless everyone is OP so it all balances out... xBTAx's made a fabulous game, if I do say so m'self.

Shidoshi Wrote:Sega;'s posts seem more like roleplay of his role than deliberately being bratty. It doesn't help his case.
"Let's lynch Sega, even if he's Town he's not helping." is not a good justification. Even inactive townies help in keeping the mafia from acquiring the majority. If he's really being inactive and weird because of other reasons I'm sure xBTAx will look to sub him out.

LuvDWayULie; keeps firing off all my "Scum!" alarms just like last game, but for now I'm assuming that's how he plays. He's not stuff for Day 1.

For me, Liable;'s justifications were mostly junk. Just congratulating people on having bred discussion and exposing intentions through voting on him doesn't make his side better when he wasn't the one that made the effort in the first place. Chaz; at least seemed more sincere and open about his stance. I feel comfortable lynching Liable today.

Shidoshi Wrote:Sega;'s posts seem more like roleplay of his role than deliberately being bratty. It doesn't help his case.
"Let's lynch Sega, even if he's Town he's not helping." is not a good justification. Even inactive townies help in keeping the mafia from acquiring the majority. If he's really being inactive and weird because of other reasons I'm sure xBTAx will look to sub him out.

LuvDWayULie; keeps firing off all my "Scum!" alarms just like last game, but for now I'm assuming that's how he plays. He's not stuff for Day 1.

For me, Liable;'s justifications were mostly junk. Just congratulating people on having bred discussion and exposing intentions through voting on him doesn't make his side better when he wasn't the one that made the effort in the first place. Chaz; at least seemed more sincere and open about his stance. I feel comfortable lynching Liable today.