![]() |
|
The math help thread - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Rubik's Cube (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Thread: The math help thread (/showthread.php?tid=16948) |
The math help thread - Salguod - 2009-12-10 Unless I'm reading it wrong, I believe the key is that she gets $7500 every 6 months, and therefore twice a year. The first increase is enough to tie with Jack's income and the second increase of the year is the extra. Year 1: Jack= 15000, Jill = 7500+ 7750 = 15250. She gets $250 more every year, so there's the $2500. The math help thread - Corn - 2009-12-10 Salguod Wrote:Unless I'm reading it wrong, I believe the key is that she gets $7500 every 6 months, and therefore twice a year, so there isn't that big gap in initial income. Oh.... I can't believe I missed that. Wow, thanks. The math help thread - Hazzy - 2009-12-14 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkCNJRfSZBU#t=01m11s "Number crunch" That suggest math is involved, not just a random guess. Where'd he get that number? The math help thread - Russt - 2009-12-14 Statistics. But 32.33 repeating sounds pretty fake.
The math help thread - Horusmaster - 2009-12-14 studying for physics exam, I stumple upon this equation on the textbook that doesn't make sense: first it says: m1(v1i-v1f)=m2(v2f-v2i) then it says: m1(v1i^2-v1f^2)=m2(v2f^2-v2i^2) I don't get how they come up with the 2nd equation... The math help thread - Nikkey - 2009-12-14 Horusmaster Wrote:studying for physics exam, I stumple upon this equation on the textbook that doesn't make sense: Only applies if m1 = m2, if I understand the formula correct. Err, sec. Nah. Mind dragging out what it says? The math help thread - Michaels2 - 2009-12-14 Horusmaster Wrote:studying for physics exam, I stumple upon this equation on the textbook that doesn't make sense:Formula #1 looks like conservation of momentum to me, while #2 looks like conservation of energy. #1 = loss of momentum from 1st body is gained by 2nd body. #2 = loss of energy (kinetic) from 1st body is gained by 2nd body. The math help thread - FallenMemory - 2009-12-14 Find the Deritive: 1. g(t)= e^(1+3t)^2 2. y= te^-t^2 for these problems (e) is that little number 2.71 or something. The exponents inside are confusing me. I know I have to use chain rule though. The math help thread - Horusmaster - 2009-12-14 FallenMemory Wrote:Find the Deritive: 1. g'(t)=e^(1+3t)^2*2(1+3t)*3 2. y'=e^-t^2+te^-t^2*2(-t)*-1 Also I got a probability question: There's a 100% chance i get <60% for psych. There's a 36% chance i get <50% for psych. There's a 35% chance i get <60% for calc. There's a 3% chance i get <50% for calc. There's a 60% chance i get <60% for physics. There's a 20% chance i get <50% for physics. I will get kicked out of uni if I fail 2 course (get <50%). or if I fail 1 course and get <60% on 2 other courses. What's my chance of getting kicked out. The math help thread - FallenMemory - 2009-12-14 In relation to the problem I posted above there's these 3 ones I think I have the answer to, but I want a check just to be sure. Find the Deritive: 1. z= sqrt(w)/w^2+1 2. g(x)= 25x^2/e^x 3. f(z)= z^2+1/sqrt(z) I've got them down to the last step, but I think I'm messing up the simplification. @ horusmaster, Ima try to figure out that probability one. I'll edit them in if I get an answer. The math help thread - Russt - 2009-12-15 Horusmaster Wrote:1. g'(t)=e^(1+3t)^2*2(1+3t)*3For each of the three classes you have three disjoint possibilities: more than 60% (call this 'A'), between 50 and 60% (B), and below 50% ©. Also, for the final result you have two possibilities: pass (P) and fail (F). F = 2 C and 1 anything, or 1 C and 2 B P = 3 B or higher, or 1 C, 1 A, 1 B or higher So, making a tree: 0% psych-A 64% psych-B -> 65% calc-A (P) -> 32% calc-B --> 40% physics-A (P) --> 40% physics-B (P) --> 20% physics-C (F) -> 3% calc-C --> 40% physics-A (P) --> 40% physics-B (F) --> 20% physics-C (F) 36% psych-C -> 65% calc-A --> 40% physics-A (P) --> 40% physics-B (P) --> 20% physics-C (F) -> 32% calc-B --> 40% physics-A (P) --> 40% physics-B (F) --> 20% physics-C (F) -> 3% calc-C (F) Summing up all the F's... 0.64 * 0.32 * 0.2 0.64 * 0.03 * 0.6 0.36 * 0.65 * 0.2 0.36 * 0.32 * 0.6 0.36 * 0.3 = 0.2764 = 27.64% chance. The math help thread - Horusmaster - 2009-12-18 thx ruust, that's kinda higher than I expected... but oh well, what's done is done I just wrote the algebra exam, while i'm 100% sure I'll get >60% there's this question that I have no idea how to do: prove: gcd (5^98+3, 5^99+1) =14 The math help thread - Nikkey - 2009-12-18 You could use Fermat's little Theorem and prove that ![]() (And that both equal to 0) Though that doesn't prove that there aren't a higher number which divides both numbers. The math help thread - Russt - 2009-12-18 a = 5^98+3 b = 5^99+1 b isn't divisible by 5, so gcd(a, b) = gcd(5a, b) 5a = 5^99+15 5a-b is 14, so the gcd must be a factor of 14 (1, 2, 7, or 14). Both numbers are even, so they're divisible by 2 -> gcd is divisible by 2. Now to prove that it equals 14, you have to show that they're divisible by 7. ... -shrugs- The math help thread - Hazzy - 2009-12-18 Code: if d>=P value: reduction = 0.7*(L/1300 + 8/9*n)*(d-P) + (n*d)I want to rewrite this to express d in terms of n, P, and L. Absolutely no idea how. The math help thread - Russt - 2009-12-18 Several roots. reduction = 0.7*(L/1300 + 8/9*n)*(d-P) + (n*d) = 0.7*(L/1300 + 8/9*n)*d + n*d - 0.7*(L/1300 + 8/9*n)*P reduction + 0.7*(L/1300 + 8/9*n)*P = 0.7(L/1300 + 146/63*n)*d 1. d = (reduction + 0.7P*(L/1300 + 8/9*n)) / 0.7(L/1300 + 146/63*n) (only if resulting expression is greater than or equal to P) reduction = 1.3*(L/550 + n)*(d-P) + n*d = 1.3*(L/550+n)*d - 1.3*(L/550+n)*P + n*d reduction + 1.3P*(L/550+n) = (1.3*L/550 + 2.3*n)*d 2. d = (reduction + 1.3P*L/550 + 1.3*n)) / (1.3*L/550 + 2.3*n) (only if L < 15 and the resulting expression is less than P) Same thing with the third one I'm too lazy -goes to play S4- The math help thread - Matt - 2009-12-20 Got two more variable problems. I always screw up on these for some reason - I've solved similar ones with numbers, but I just get lost when we change to variables. Find the maximum volume of a right-circular cone placed upside-down in a right circular cone of radius R and height H. http://img451.imageshack.us/img451/6751/optimizationfi3.jpg Find the maximum area of a rectangle that can be circumscribed about a given rectangle with length L and width W. http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/530/rectyrec.png Thanks The math help thread - KajitiSouls - 2009-12-20 Matt Wrote:Find the maximum volume of a right-circular cone placed upside-down in a right circular cone of radius R and height H. http://img451.imageshack.us/img451/6751/optimizationfi3.jpg Fun stuff this be. Volume of a right-circular cone = 1/3*Π*r^2*h The dimensions of the upside-down cone can be written in terms of the standing cone's dimensions. Code: r = r; 0 ≤ r ≤ RCode: v' = 2/3*Π*r*H - Π*r^2*H/RMatt Wrote:Find the maximum area of a rectangle that can be circumscribed about a given rectangle with length L and width W. Now this one is considerably trickier. To determine the new dimensions of the circumscribed rectangle based on the original rectangle's dimensions L and W, and the variable θ, we'll apply geometry and trigonometry. Code: sin(θ) = o/hCode: V' = (-sin(θ)^2 + cos(θ)^2)*(W^2 + L^2)The math help thread - HooKarez - 2009-12-20 Find the volume of the largest right circular cylinder that can be inscribed in a sphere of radius r. I need better calc skills. This is pissing me off that I can't solve this. :[ The math help thread - Horusmaster - 2009-12-20 just wondering what's right circular cylinder? edit: nvm just a fancy name for cylinder >.> working on it now ![]() ![]() let R be radius of sphere and r be radius of cylinder so basically h=2Rsin@ and r=Rcos@ so volume= piRcos^2@2Rsin@ and differentiate and solve |